Literature DB >> 12186292

Characterization of emissions from burning incense.

James J Jetter1, Zhishi Guo, Jenia A McBrian, Michael R Flynn.   

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to improve the characterization of particulate matter emissions from burning incense. Emissions of particulate matter were measured for 23 different types of incense using a cyclone/filter method. Emission rates for PM2.5 (particulate matter less than 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter) ranged from 7 to 202 mg/h, and PM2.5 emission factors ranged from 5 to 56 mg/g of incense burned. Emission rates were also determined using an electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI) and a small electrostatic precipitator (ESP), and emission rates were compared to those determined using the cyclone/filter method. Emission rates determined by the ELPI method were consistently lower than those determined by the cyclone/filter method, and a linear regression correlation was found between emission rates determined by the two methods. Emission rates determined by the ESP method were consistently higher than those determined by the cyclone/filter method, indicating that the ESP may be a more effective method for measuring semivolatile particle emissions. A linear regression correlation was also found between emission rates determined by the ESP and cyclone/filter methods. Particle size distributions were measured with the ELPI, and distributions were found to be similar for most types of incense that were tested. Size distributions by mass typically ranged from approximately 0.06 to 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter, with peak values between 0.26 and 0.65 microm. Results indicated that burning incense emits fine particulate matter in large quantities compared to other indoor sources. An indoor air quality model showed that indoor concentrations of PM25 can far exceed the outdoor concentrations specified by the US EPA's National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), so incense smoke can pose a health risk to people due to inhalation exposure of particulate matter. Emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), nitric oxide (NO), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) were also measured for seven types of incense. Emission rates of the gaseous pollutants were sufficient to cause indoor concentrations, estimated using the indoor air quality model, to exceed the outdoor concentrations specified by the NAAQS under certain conditions. However, the incense samples that were tested would fill a room with thick smoke under these conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12186292     DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(02)00043-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  21 in total

Review 1.  The pyrohealth transition: how combustion emissions have shaped health through human history.

Authors:  Fay H Johnston; Shannon Melody; David M J S Bowman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Emission of volatile organic compounds from religious and ritual activities in India.

Authors:  Shippi Dewangan; Rajan Chakrabarty; Barbara Zielinska; Shamsh Pervez
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Cardiovascular impacts and micro-environmental exposure factors associated with continuous personal PM2.5 monitoring.

Authors:  Davyda Hammond; Carry Croghan; Hwashin Shin; Richard Burnett; Robert Bard; Robert D Brook; Ron Williams
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Environmental health risks and benefits of the use of mosquito coils as malaria prevention and control strategy.

Authors:  Jonathan N Hogarh; Thomas P Agyekum; Crentsil Kofi Bempah; Emmanuel D J Owusu-Ansah; Silas W Avicor; Gordon A Awandare; Julius N Fobil; Kwasi Obiri-Danso
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Incense use and respiratory tract carcinomas: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jeppe T Friborg; Jian-Min Yuan; Renwei Wang; Woon-Puay Koh; Hin-Peng Lee; Mimi C Yu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Real-time indoor PM2.5 monitoring in an urban cohort: Implications for exposure disparities and source control.

Authors:  MyDzung T Chu; Sara E Gillooly; Jonathan I Levy; Jose Vallarino; Lacy N Reyna; Jose Guillermo Cedeño Laurent; Brent A Coull; Gary Adamkiewicz
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Indoor air pollutants and health in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Karin B Yeatts; Mohamed El-Sadig; David Leith; William Kalsbeek; Fatma Al-Maskari; David Couper; William E Funk; Taoufik Zoubeidi; Ronna L Chan; Chris B Trent; Christopher A Davidson; Maryanne G Boundy; Maamoon M Kassab; Mohamed Y Hasan; Ivan Rusyn; Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Household inhalants exposure and nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk: a large-scale case-control study in Guangdong, China.

Authors:  Yong-Qiao He; Wen-Qiong Xue; Guo-Ping Shen; Ling-Ling Tang; Yi-Xin Zeng; Wei-Hua Jia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Particle concentrations in inner-city homes of children with asthma: the effect of smoking, cooking, and outdoor pollution.

Authors:  Lance A Wallace; Herman Mitchell; George T O'Connor; Lucas Neas; Morton Lippmann; Meyer Kattan; Jane Koenig; James W Stout; Ben J Vaughn; Dennis Wallace; Michelle Walter; Ken Adams; Lee-Jane Sally Liu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Incense smoke: clinical, structural and molecular effects on airway disease.

Authors:  Ta-Chang Lin; Guha Krishnaswamy; David S Chi
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2008-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.