Literature DB >> 12185891

A note on ANOVA assumptions and robust analysis for a cross-over study.

Xun Chen1, Peng-Liang Zhao, Ji Zhang.   

Abstract

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods are usually applied to analyse continuous data from cross-over studies. The analysis, however, may not have appropriate type I error when certain assumptions are violated. In this paper, we first clarify a conventionally minimum set of assumptions that validate the F-tests of ANOVA models for cross-over studies. We then provide a practical verification/remedy procedure based upon the theoretical developments. By applying the verification/remedy procedure, more robust analysis results can be expected from the ANOVA models.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12185891     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  Multiclass machine learning vs. conventional calculators for stroke/CVD risk assessment using carotid plaque predictors with coronary angiography scores as gold standard: a 500 participants study.

Authors:  Ankush D Jamthikar; Deep Gupta; Laura E Mantella; Luca Saba; John R Laird; Amer M Johri; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Efficacy and Safety of a New Formulation of Pancrelipase (Ultrase MT20) in the Treatment of Malabsorption in Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency in Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Michael W Konstan; Theodore G Liou; Steven D Strausbaugh; Richard Ahrens; Jamshed F Kanga; Gavin R Graff; Kathryn Moffett; Susan L Millard; Samya Z Nasr; Edith Siméon; Jean Spénard; Josée Grondin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Official social media and its impact on public behavior during the first wave of COVID-19 in China.

Authors:  Huan Liu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.