Literature DB >> 12185888

Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.

Stephen Lake1, Erin Kammann, Neil Klar, Rebecca Betensky.   

Abstract

Cluster randomization trials in which families are the unit of allocation are commonly adopted for the evaluation of disease prevention interventions. Sample size estimation for cluster randomization trials depends on parameters that quantify the variability within and between clusters and the variability in cluster size. Accurate advance estimates of these nuisance parameters may be difficult to obtain and misspecification may lead to an underpowered study. Since families are typically recruited over time, we propose using a portion of the data to estimate the nuisance parameters and to re-estimate sample size based on the estimates. This extends the standard internal pilot study methods to the setting of cluster randomization trials. The effect of this design on the power, significance level and sample size is analysed via simulation and is shown to provide a flexible and practical approach to cluster randomization trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12185888     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  20 in total

Review 1.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments.

Authors:  David M Murray; Sherri P Varnell; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Internal pilots for a class of linear mixed models with Gaussian and compound symmetric data.

Authors:  Matthew J Gurka; Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Sample size considerations when groups are the appropriate unit of analysis.

Authors:  Georgia Robins Sadler; Celine Marie Ko; Jennifer Alisangco; Bradley P Rosbrook; Eric Miller; Judith Fullerton
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.257

4.  Challenges in Implementing Hospice Clinical Trials: Preserving Scientific Integrity While Facing Change.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; Karla T Washington; George Demiris; Patrick White
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 5.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Adaptive designs for randomized trials in public health.

Authors:  C Hendricks Brown; Thomas R Ten Have; Booil Jo; Getachew Dagne; Peter A Wyman; Bengt Muthén; Robert D Gibbons
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 21.981

7.  A post hoc evaluation of a sample size re-estimation in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study.

Authors:  Leslie A McClure; Jeff M Szychowski; Oscar Benavente; Robert G Hart; Christopher S Coffey
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Impact of complex, partially nested clustering in a three-arm individually randomized group treatment trial: A case study with the wHOPE trial.

Authors:  Guangyu Tong; Karen H Seal; William C Becker; Fan Li; James D Dziura; Peter N Peduzzi; Denise A Esserman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes associated with cancer: methods of a randomized controlled trial SAKK 95/06 E-MOSAIC.

Authors:  David Blum; Dieter Koeberle; Karin Ribi; Shu-Fang Hsu Schmitz; Urs Utiger; Dirk Klingbiel; Florian Strasser
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  A priori postulated and real power in cluster randomized trials: mind the gap.

Authors:  Lydia Guittet; Bruno Giraudeau; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.