Literature DB >> 12184713

Influence of two different inhalation devices on therapy compliance in asthmatic patients.

Constant Paul van Schayck1, Ingrid Desirée Bijl-Hofland, Hans Folgering, Sonja Gerarda Martina Cloosterman, Reinier Akkermans, Frank van den Elshout, Chris van Weel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of inhalation device (Autohaler versus metered dose inhaler) and patients' subjective opinion towards the different devices, as well as daily frequency and duration of treatment on medication compliance.
DESIGN: Prospective study measuring compliance in the same patients of the Autohaler twice daily with the metered dose inhaler twice daily, as well the Autohaler twice daily with the Autohaler four times daily.
SETTING: Primary health care.
SUBJECTS: 34 subjects with asthma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients preference and compliance.
RESULTS: Patients preferred the Autohaler. The percentage of patients with a negative opinion towards the metered dose inhaler was 38% compared with 12% towards the Autohaler. The median values of the compliance rate of the Autohaler with twice and four times daily frequency were 90.8% (25-75th percentile 61.6-98.0%) and 78.5% (25-75th percentile 49.0%-91.2%), respectively (p < 0.001). The duration of treatment period had a significant negative influence on compliance when four times daily dosage frequency was prescribed (p = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the devices (metered dose inhaler and Autohaler) and the patients' opinion about the devices did not significantly contribute to the compliance rates. Compliance towards the medication treatment, however, is negatively influenced by a high daily frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12184713     DOI: 10.1080/pri.20.2.126.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  6 in total

Review 1.  Optimal management of asthma in elderly patients: strategies to improve adherence to recommended interventions.

Authors:  Dianne P Goeman; Jo A Douglass
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Patient-centered care and its effect on outcomes in the treatment of asthma.

Authors:  Nashmia Qamar; Andrea A Pappalardo; Vineet M Arora; Valerie G Press
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2011-03-06

3.  Delivery characteristics and patients' handling of two single-dose dry-powder inhalers used in COPD.

Authors:  Kenneth R Chapman; Charles M Fogarty; Clare Peckitt; Cheryl Lassen; Dalal Jadayel; Juergen Dederichs; Mukul Dalvi; Benjamin Kramer
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2011-06-23

4.  Qualitative assessment of attributes and ease of use of the ELLIPTA™ dry powder inhaler for delivery of maintenance therapy for asthma and COPD.

Authors:  Henrik Svedsater; Peter Dale; Karl Garrill; Richard Walker; Mark W Woepse
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.317

5.  Acceptability and preference of three inhalation devices assessed by the Handling Questionnaire in asthma and COPD patients.

Authors:  Roberto W Dal Negro; Massimiliano Povero
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2016-02-10

6.  Dry-powder inhalers in patients with persistent airflow limitation: usability and preference.

Authors:  Roberto W Dal Negro; Massimiliano Povero
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2016-09-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.