Literature DB >> 12184592

Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation.

H Halis Unlu1, Baris Toprak, Asim Aslan, Cenap Guler.   

Abstract

The surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy was analyzed in 30 cases of postsaccal stenosis. Intubation with silicone tubing was used in 14 cases (46.7%) and not used in 16 cases (53.3%). Surgical success was evaluated subjectively and objectively. The patients' complaints were improved in 85.7% of cases in the intubation group, and in 81.3% of the group in which no stent was used. Postoperative endoscopic examinations revealed that the rhinostomy opening was visible in 11 cases without intubation (68.8%) and 9 cases with intubation (64.3%). Six patients in the intubation group (42.9%) had granulation tissue at the rhinostomy site. Four patients (28.6%) had complaints regarding the intubation. Considering the similar surgical success rates, and the granulation formation, patient discomfort, and cost related to intubation, we recommend endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without intubation as the treatment of choice in cases of chronic epiphora due to postsaccal stenosis of the lacrimal canal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12184592     DOI: 10.1177/000348940211100809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  30 in total

1.  Paediatric powered endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Dania Al-Nuaimi; Clare Inkster; Christopher Lobo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comparison of endocanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy with and without endonasal procedures.

Authors:  Hikmet Basmak; Hamdi Caklı; Afsun Sahin; Huseyin Gursoy; Ahmet Ozer; Ender Altun; Nilgün Yildirim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Chronic inflammation: a poor prognostic factor for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Ozlem Ozer; Görkem Eskiizmir; Halis Unlü; Aydin Işisağ; Asim Aslan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  [Treatment of lacrimal stenosis. Causes, diagnostics, and surgical procedures].

Authors:  M B Bloching; J Prescher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Endoscopic DCR without stents: clinical guidelines and procedure.

Authors:  Basil M N Saeed
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  [Indications and techniques for intubation of the lacrimal ducts].

Authors:  U Schaudig; P Heidari
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Analysis of 104 cases of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in a tertiary care hospital: a prospective study.

Authors:  Rashmi Goyal; Saroj Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-04

8.  Prognostic factors for outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Shiu Ting Mak; Ida Yu-fong Io; Albert Chak-ming Wong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: creation of a large marsupialized lacrimal sac.

Authors:  Hong-Ryul Jin; Je-Yeob Yeon; Mi-Young Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Changes in cytokines in tears after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  J K Lee; T H Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.