Literature DB >> 12184564

Semantic aspects of morphological processing: transparency effects in Serbian.

Laurie Beth Feldman1, Dragana Barac-Cikoja, Aleksandar Kostić.   

Abstract

We examined the contribution of semantics to morphological facilitation in the visual lexical decision task at two stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) with Serbian materials. Primes appeared in Roman or Cyrillic characters. Targets always were printed in Roman. When primes were presented at an SOA of 250 msec, decision latencies to verbal targets (e.g., VOLIM) showed greatest facilitation after inflectionally (e.g., VOLE) related primes, significantly less after semantically transparent derived primes (e.g., ZAVOLE), and less again after semantically opaque derived primes (e.g., PREVOLE). Latencies after semantically transparent and opaque derived target words did not differ at an SOA of 48 msec. Both were slower than after inflectionally related primes. Stated generally, effects of semantic transparency among derivationally related verb forms were evident at long SOAs, but not at short ones. Under alphabet-alternating conditions, magnitudes of facilitation were greater overall, but the pattern was similar. The outcome suggests that restricted processing time for the prime limits the contribution of semantics to morphological processing and calls into question accounts that posit a task-invariant semantic criterion for morphological decomposition within the lexicon.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12184564     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Morphological priming: the role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position.

Authors:  L B Feldman; E G Soltano
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Morphological priming: dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors.

Authors:  R Frost; A Deutsch; O Gilboa; M Tannenbaum; W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

3.  Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form?

Authors:  L B Feldman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Does prime modality influence morphological processing?

Authors:  Matthew John Pastizzo; Laurie Beth Feldman
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Is alphabet biasing in bialphabetical word perception automatic and prelexical?

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey; D Todorović
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  S Bentin; L B Feldman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1990-11

7.  Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition.

Authors:  E Drews; P Zwitserlood
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  A Deutsch; R Frost; K I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.

Authors:  R Frost; K I Forster; A Deutsch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin.

Authors:  L B Feldman; J Moskovljević
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  10 in total

1.  Morphemes in their place: Evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes.

Authors:  Davide Crepaldi; Kathleen Rastle; Colin J Davis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

2.  Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: an ERP investigation.

Authors:  Joanna Morris; Tiffany Frank; Jonathan Grainger; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: the case of prefixed words.

Authors:  Kevin Diependaele; Dominiek Sandra; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

4.  Are CORNER and BROTHER Morphologically Complex? Not in the Long Term.

Authors:  Jay G Rueckl; Karen Aicher
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2008-11-13

Review 5.  From decomposition to distributed theories of morphological processing in reading.

Authors:  Patience Stevens; David C Plaut
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-05-20

6.  Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: a violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition.

Authors:  Laurie Beth Feldman; Patrick A O'Connor; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

7.  Opacity, Transparency, and Morphological Priming: A Study of Prefixed Verbs in Dutch.

Authors:  Ava Creemers; Amy Goodwin Davies; Robert J Wilder; Meredith Tamminga; David Embick
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Take a stand on understanding: electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs.

Authors:  Eva Smolka; Matthias Gondan; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs.

Authors:  Sophie De Grauwe; Kristin Lemhöfer; Roel M Willems; Herbert Schriefers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis.

Authors:  Laurie B Feldman; Petar Milin; Kit W Cho; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín; Patrick A O'Connor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.