| Literature DB >> 12183772 |
Caron B Rockman1, Patrick J Lamparello, Mark A Adelman, Glenn R Jacobowitz, Sonya Therff, Paul J Gagne, Matthew Nalbandian, Jonathan Weiswasser, Ronnie Landis, Robert Rosen, Thomas S Riles.
Abstract
Since the Food and Drug Administrations' approval of endovascular devices for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, clinicians have been relaxing the strict inclusion criteria present during the clinical trials. Although the long-term natural history of endoleaks remains unclear, attachment site leaks (type I) are believed to represent an ongoing risk for future rupture. We reviewed our experience with endovascular AAA repair to elucidate factors that predispose toward the development of endoleaks and found that larger AAAs are significantly more likely to have a short proximal neck and severe proximal angulation. These factors likely contribute to the significantly increased rate of type I endoleaks that occurred after endovascular repair of large AAAs. Small AAAs (<5) had the lowest rate of endoleaks overall (8.3%) and of type I endoleaks in particular (0%). We conclude that AAA size and morphology can be used to predict which aneurysms will experience attachment site endoleaks in their course; AAAs from 4.5 to 5 cm in diameter may be particularly well suited for endovascular repair in this regard.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12183772 DOI: 10.1007/s10016-001-0200-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Vasc Surg ISSN: 0890-5096 Impact factor: 1.466