Literature DB >> 12183347

Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Otto Bjoertomt1, Alan Cowey, Vincent Walsh.   

Abstract

Localized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to disrupt visuospatial perception in the near and far space of six healthy volunteer subjects. In addition to the baseline condition, they were stimulated over the right posterior parietal cortex, the right or left dorsal occipital cortex or the right ventral occipital cortex, during the brief presentation of a transected horizontal line. Subjects had to indicate whether the part of the line to the left or right of the transection appeared longer. The stimulus display was back-projected on a screen at a viewing distance of either 50 or 150 cm ("near" and "far" space, respectively). Reaction times and choices were measured. In a forced-choice paradigm, subjects showed "pseudoneglect", the natural tendency of neurologically intact subjects to perceive the left side of a centrally transected line as slightly longer than the right. These errors occurred more for lines in near space than for lines in far space. Magnetic stimulation of the right posterior parietal cortex or the right ventral occipital lobe selectively induced a significant shift to the right in the perceived midpoint for near- and far-space lines, respectively. The results reproduced in normal subjects the dissociation between neglect in near and far space that has been described in patients with different right-hemisphere lesions. This dissociation supports the contention that there is a dorsal/near space-ventral/far space segregation of processing in the visual system which reflects the behavioural goals of the two putative visual streams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12183347     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  59 in total

1.  The long and the short of it: on the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time.

Authors:  Mahesh Srinivasan; Susan Carey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-08

2.  EEG activity related to preparation and suppression of eye movements in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Areti Tzelepi; Antoine Lutz; Zoi Kapoula
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Mirror apraxia affects the peripersonal mirror space. A combined lesion and cerebral activation study.

Authors:  Ferdinand Binkofski; Andrew Butler; Giovanni Buccino; Wolfgang Heide; Gereon Fink; Hans-Joachim Freund; Rüdiger J Seitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A novel approach for documenting phosphenes induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Seth Elkin-Frankston; Peter J Fried; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; R J Rushmore; Antoni Valero-Cabr
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

6.  Modulation of excitatory and inhibitory circuits for visual awareness in the human right parietal cortex.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Massimiliano Oliveri; Sara Torriero; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The Ferrier Lecture 2004 what can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works?

Authors:  Alan Cowey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Decreased leftward 'aiming' motor-intentional spatial cuing in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Daymond Wagner; Paul J Eslinger; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Adrian Kamer; Andrea M Loftus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Spatial neglect: clinical and neuroscience review: a wealth of information on the poverty of spatial attention.

Authors:  John C Adair; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.