Literature DB >> 12183305

Randomised study of long term outcome after epidural versus non-epidural analgesia during labour.

Charlotte J Howell1, Tracy Dean, Linda Lucking, Krysia Dziedzic, Peter W Jones, Richard B Johanson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether epidural analgesia during labour is associated with long term backache.
DESIGN: Follow up after randomised controlled trial. Analysis by intention to treat.
SETTING: Department of obstetrics and gynaecology at one NHS trust. PARTICIPANTS: 369 women: 184 randomised to epidural group (treatment as allocated received by 123) and 185 randomised to non-epidural group (treatment as allocated received by 133). In the follow up study 151 women were from the epidural group and 155 from the non-epidural group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self reported low back pain, disability, and limitation of movement assessed through one to one interviews with physiotherapist, questionnaire on back pain and disability, physical measurements of spinal mobility.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in demographic details or other key characteristics. The mean time interval from delivery to interview was 26 months. There were no significant differences in the onset or duration of low back pain, with nearly a third of women in each group reporting pain in the week before interview. There were no differences in self reported measures of disability in activities of daily living and no significant differences in measurements of spinal mobility.
CONCLUSIONS: After childbirth there are no differences in the incidence of long term low back pain, disability, or movement restriction between women who receive epidural pain relief and women who receive other forms of pain relief.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12183305      PMCID: PMC117883          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7360.357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  18 in total

1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Backache and epidural analgesia: a retrospective survey of mothers 1 year after childbirth.

Authors:  J MacLeod; C MacIntyre; J H McClure; A Whitfield
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.603

3.  Reliability of clinical measurements of forward bending using the modified fingertip-to-floor method.

Authors:  M G Gauvin; D L Riddle; J M Rothstein
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1990-07

4.  The relationship of low-back pain to pregnancy and gynecologic factors.

Authors:  H O Svensson; G B Andersson; A Hagstad; P O Jansson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Serious non-fatal complications associated with extradural block in obstetric practice.

Authors:  D B Scott; B M Hibbard
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Measurement of back movement.

Authors:  I F Macrae; V Wright
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Epidural anaesthesia and long term backache after childbirth.

Authors:  C MacArthur; M Lewis; E G Knox; J S Crawford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-07

9.  Factors associated with back pain after childbirth.

Authors:  T W Breen; B J Ransil; P A Groves; N E Oriol
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Assessing long term backache after childbirth.

Authors:  R Russell; P Groves; N Taub; J O'Dowd; F Reynolds
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-15
View more
  14 in total

1.  Epidurals and backache: again?

Authors:  Felicity Reynolds
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-02

2.  Does caesarean section negatively influence the post-partum prognosis of low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy?

Authors:  Ingrid M Mogren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence.

Authors:  W H Wu; O G Meijer; K Uegaki; J M A Mens; J H van Dieën; P I J M Wuisman; H C Ostgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia for preventing chronic pain after surgery.

Authors:  Michael H Andreae; Doerthe A Andreae
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

5.  Is there a relationship between parity, pregnancy, back pain and incontinence?

Authors:  Michelle D Smith; Anne Russell; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-07-31

Review 6.  Regional anaesthesia in pre-eclampsia: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Nanda Gopal Mandal; Sridhar Surapaneni
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Non-Obstetric Pain in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Abdul Lalkhen; Kate Grady
Journal:  Rev Pain       Date:  2008-03

8.  Epidural analgesia during labor vs no analgesia: A comparative study.

Authors:  Wesam Farid Mousa; Roshdi Al-Metwalli; Manal Mostafa
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

Review 9.  Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children.

Authors:  Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 10.  Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children.

Authors:  Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.