Literature DB >> 12182977

Is there a difference in outcome between stage I-II endometrial cancer of papillary serous/clear cell and endometrioid FIGO Grade 3 cancer?

Kaled M Alektiar1, Andrea McKee, Oscar Lin, Ennapadam Venkatraman, Michael J Zelefsky, Brady McKee, William J Hoskins, Richard R Barakat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several reports in the literature have shown that, compared with endometrioid adenocarcinoma, patients with papillary serous (PS) and clear cell (CC) histologic features do worse. However, it is unclear whether the outcome of PS/CC cancer is different from that of poorly differentiated endometrioid cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome between PS/CC and endometrioid International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Grade 3 cancer and was limited to patients with Stage I-II uterine carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 1987 and September 1999, 83 patients with Stage I endometrial cancer and Stage II occult endometrial cancer were treated with simple hysterectomy and high-dose-rate intravaginal brachytherapy. Forty-one patients (49%) had FIGO Grade 3 endometrioid tumors (Group 1) and 42 (51%) had PS/CC histologic features (Group 2). The mean age was 63 years (range 30-89). Comprehensive surgical staging was done in 23 (28%) of 83 patients. Capillary space-like invasion (CSLI) was seen in 24 (29%) of 83 patients. The median dose of intravaginal brachytherapy when used alone was 21 Gy in 3 fractions. Additional external beam radiotherapy was given to 42 (51%) of 83 patients to 45 Gy. The two groups were balanced with regard to age, race, comprehensive surgical staging, amount of myometrial involvement, CSLI, lower uterine segment involvement, cervical involvement, and use of external beam radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 46 months (range 4-147).
RESULTS: The pattern of relapse was as follows: vagina/pelvis in 5 of 14 patients, lungs in 8 of 15, intra-abdominal in 4 of 12, and supraclavicular lymph nodes in 1 of 14. One of the four intra-abdominal disseminations was in Group 1 and the other three in Group 2 (p = 0.6). The 5-year vaginal/pelvic control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rate was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87-99%), 79% (95% CI 69-89%), and 74% (95% CI 64-85%), respectively. No significant difference in outcome was found between Groups 1 and 2. The 5-year vaginal/pelvic control rate was 97% (95% CI 91-100%) in Group 1 compared with 90% (95% CI 81-99%) in Group 2 (p = 0.2). The 5-year DFS rate was 79% (95% CI 64-95%) in Group 1 vs. 78% (95% CI 65-92%) in Group 2 (p = 0.6), and the 5-year OS rate was 71% (95% CI 55-87%) in Group 1 vs. 79% (95% CI 66-92%) in Group 2 (p = 0.3). The influence on outcome of age, race, comprehensive surgical staging, CSLI, amount of myometrial invasion, cervical involvement, lower uterine segment involvement, and presence of pure PS or CC histologic features was evaluated. On multivariate analysis, only CSLI correlated with poor DFS (p = 0.04; relative risk 3, 95% CI 1-9) and OS (p = 0.02; relative risk 3, 95% CI 1-6).
CONCLUSION: On the basis of the results of this study, no significant difference in outcome exists between patients with Stage I-II endometrial cancer with PS/CC histologic features and those with similar stage disease, but with FIGO Grade 3 endometrioid histologic features. CSLI was the only independent predictor of poor DFS and OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12182977     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02913-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in stages II/III/IV and stages III/IV endometrioid and serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  P Mhawech-Fauceglia; R F Herrmann; J Kesterson; I Izevbaye; S Lele; K Odunsi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Redefining stage I endometrial cancer: incorporating histology, a binary grading system, myometrial invasion, and lymph node assessment.

Authors:  Joyce N Barlin; Robert A Soslow; Megan Lutz; Qin C Zhou; Caryn M St Clair; Mario M Leitao; Alexia Iasonos; Martee L Hensley; Richard R Barakat; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Improving oncologic outcomes for women with endometrial cancer: realigning our sights.

Authors:  Sean C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Matei; Virginia Filiaci; Marcus E Randall; David Mutch; Margaret M Steinhoff; Paul A DiSilvestro; Katherine M Moxley; Yong M Kim; Matthew A Powell; David M O'Malley; Nick M Spirtos; William Small; Krishnansu S Tewari; William E Richards; John Nakayama; Ursula A Matulonis; Helen Q Huang; David S Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?

Authors:  Taejong Song; Chel Hun Choi; Yoo-Young Lee; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Poor prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma compared with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma in early stage patients.

Authors:  Ji Young Park; Joo-Hyun Nam; Young-Tak Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Dae-Yeon Kim; Insuk Sohn; Shin-Wha Lee; Chang Ohk Sung; Kyu-Rae Kim
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients are associated with CXCL12 and estrogen receptor expression.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Roslyn A Stone; Mamatha Chivukula; Robert Bowser; Anil V Parwani; Faina Linkov; Robert P Edwards; Joel L Weissfeld
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  The occurrence of fetal microchimeric cells in endometrial tissues is a very common phenomenon in benign uterine disorders, and the lower prevalence of fetal microchimerism is associated with better uterine cancer prognoses.

Authors:  Ilona Hromadnikova; Katerina Kotlabova; Petra Pirkova; Pavla Libalova; Zdenka Vernerova; Bohuslav Svoboda; Eduard Kucera
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.311

9.  Insights into endometrial serous carcinogenesis and progression.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-10

10.  Proliferative activity in postmenopausal endometrium: the lurking potential for giving rise to an endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  E Sivridis; A Giatromanolaki
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.