Literature DB >> 12182309

Healing of alveolar bone in resorbable and non-resorbable membrane-protected defects. A histologic pilot study in dogs.

Ana Vitoria Imbronito1, Jose H Todescan, Cassio V Carvalho, Victor E Arana-Chavez.   

Abstract

Two main types of membrane barriers are used for bone regeneration, non-resorbable and resorbable. Polytetrafluorethilene non-resorbable membranes have been extensively studied but they require a second surgical step for removal. Although polylactic acid (PLA) resorbable membranes avoid this problem, they have not been sufficiently evaluated on bone defects. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the healing events of bone regeneration after placement of non-resorbable or resorbable membranes and to evaluate the amount of newly formed bone 2 and 4 months after membrane placement. Mandibular second, third and fourth premolars of four adult mongrel dogs were extracted bilaterally. Two rectangular bone defects (8 mm corono-apical and 12 mm mesial-distal) were created bilaterally 3 months after tooth extractions. Each dog received two resorbable membranes and one non-resorbable membrane; one defect was left untreated. Two dogs were killed at 2 months and the remaining two at 4 months following surgery. Undecalcified sections were obtained and stained with toluidine blue and pyronin G. Histomorphometric analysis was performed using the NIH Image software. Newly formed bone was observed under both resorbable and non-resorbable membranes. The amount of regenerated bone was similar between both treatments at 2 and 4 months after surgery. At 2 months, the newly formed bone was still immature whereas at 4 months some areas of woven bone were observed. The bone formation observed in the untreated defects was significantly lower than that observed in both resorbable and non-resorbable membrane-protected defects. In summary, the present study suggests that PLA membranes can yield good results when used on bone defects while avoid a second surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12182309     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00145-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  7 in total

1.  Influence of beta-radiation sterilisation in properties of new chitosan/soybean protein isolate membranes for guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  R M Silva; C Elvira; J F Mano; J San Román; R L Reis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Novel pycnodysostosis mouse model uncovers cathepsin K function as a potential regulator of osteoclast apoptosis and senescence.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Shuying Yang; Yoke Abe; Ming Li; Yucheng Wang; Jianzhong Shao; En Li; Yi-Ping Li
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study.

Authors:  Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli; Edith Umasi Ramos; Allice Santos Cruz Veras; Giovana Rampazzo Teixeira; Leonardo P Faverani; Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-24

4.  A novel composite membrane of chitosan-carboxymethyl cellulose polyelectrolyte complex membrane filled with nano-hydroxyapatite I. Preparation and properties.

Authors:  Jiang Liuyun; Li Yubao; Xiong Chengdong
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Tadas Korzinskas; Ole Jung; Ralf Smeets; Sanja Stojanovic; Stevo Najman; Kristina Glenske; Michael Hahn; Sabine Wenisch; Reinhard Schnettler; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Combination of Bioactive Polymeric Membranes and Stem Cells for Periodontal Regeneration: In Vitro and In Vivo Analyses.

Authors:  Flávia Gonçalves; Míriam Santos de Moraes; Lorraine Braga Ferreira; Ana Cláudia Oliveira Carreira; Patrícia Mayumi Kossugue; Letícia Cristina Cidreira Boaro; Ricardo Bentini; Célia Regina da Silva Garcia; Mari Cleide Sogayar; Victor Elias Arana-Chavez; Luiz Henrique Catalani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bone Regeneration Capability of 3D Printed Ceramic Scaffolds.

Authors:  Ju-Won Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang; Seok-Jin Hong; Hyo-Geun Choi; Sun-Ju Byeon; Ho-Kyung Lim; Sung-Min Chung; Jong-Ho Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.