BACKGROUND: Physical performance of sea-level (SL) residents acutely exposed to altitude (ALT) is diminished and may improve somewhat with ALT acclimatization. HYPOTHESIS: A large reduction in lean body mass (LBM), due to severe energy intake deficit during the first 21 d of ALT (4300 m) acclimatization, will adversely affect performance. METHODS: At ALT, 10 men received a deficit (DEF) of 1500 kcal x d(-1) below body weight (BW) maintenance requirements and 7 men received adequate (ADQ) kcal x d(-1) to maintain BW. Performance was assessed by: 1) maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max); 2) time to complete 50 cycles of a lift and carry task (L+C); 3) number of one-arm elbow flexions (10% BW at 22 flexions x min(-1); and 4) adductor pollicis (AP) muscle strength and endurance time (repeated 5-s static contractions at 50% of maximal force followed by 5-s rest, to exhaustion). Performance and body composition (using BW and circumference measures) were determined at SL and at ALT on days 2 through 21. RESULTS: At SL, there were no between-group differences (p > 0.05) for any of the performance measures. From SL to day 21 at ALT, BW and LBM declined by 6.6 +/- 3 kg and 4.6 kg, respectively, for the DEF group (both p < 0.01), but did not change (both p > 0.05) for the ADQ group. Performance changes from day 2 or 3 to day 20 or 21 at ALT were as follows (values are means +/- SD): VO2max (ml x min(-1)): DEF = +97 +/- 237, ADQ = +159 +/- 156; L + C (s): DEF = -62 +/- 35*, ADQ = -35 +/- 20* (*p < 0.05; improved from day 3); arm flex (reps): DEF = -2 +/- 7, ADQ = +2 +/- 8; AP endurance (min): DEF = +1.4 +/- 2, ADQ = + 1.9 +/- 2; AP strength (kg): DEF = -0.7 +/- 4, ADQ = -1.2 +/- 2. There were no differences in performance between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A significant BW and LBM loss due to underfeeding during the first 21 d of ALT acclimatization does not impair physical performance at ALT.
BACKGROUND: Physical performance of sea-level (SL) residents acutely exposed to altitude (ALT) is diminished and may improve somewhat with ALT acclimatization. HYPOTHESIS: A large reduction in lean body mass (LBM), due to severe energy intake deficit during the first 21 d of ALT (4300 m) acclimatization, will adversely affect performance. METHODS: At ALT, 10 men received a deficit (DEF) of 1500 kcal x d(-1) below body weight (BW) maintenance requirements and 7 men received adequate (ADQ) kcal x d(-1) to maintain BW. Performance was assessed by: 1) maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max); 2) time to complete 50 cycles of a lift and carry task (L+C); 3) number of one-arm elbow flexions (10% BW at 22 flexions x min(-1); and 4) adductor pollicis (AP) muscle strength and endurance time (repeated 5-s static contractions at 50% of maximal force followed by 5-s rest, to exhaustion). Performance and body composition (using BW and circumference measures) were determined at SL and at ALT on days 2 through 21. RESULTS: At SL, there were no between-group differences (p > 0.05) for any of the performance measures. From SL to day 21 at ALT, BW and LBM declined by 6.6 +/- 3 kg and 4.6 kg, respectively, for the DEF group (both p < 0.01), but did not change (both p > 0.05) for the ADQ group. Performance changes from day 2 or 3 to day 20 or 21 at ALT were as follows (values are means +/- SD): VO2max (ml x min(-1)): DEF = +97 +/- 237, ADQ = +159 +/- 156; L + C (s): DEF = -62 +/- 35*, ADQ = -35 +/- 20* (*p < 0.05; improved from day 3); arm flex (reps): DEF = -2 +/- 7, ADQ = +2 +/- 8; AP endurance (min): DEF = +1.4 +/- 2, ADQ = + 1.9 +/- 2; AP strength (kg): DEF = -0.7 +/- 4, ADQ = -1.2 +/- 2. There were no differences in performance between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A significant BW and LBM loss due to underfeeding during the first 21 d of ALT acclimatization does not impair physical performance at ALT.
Authors: Zackery S Fullerton; Benjamin D McNair; Nicholas A Marcello; Emily E Schmitt; Danielle R Bruns Journal: High Alt Med Biol Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: Andrew W Subudhi; Nicolas Bourdillon; Jenna Bucher; Christopher Davis; Jonathan E Elliott; Morgan Eutermoster; Oghenero Evero; Jui-Lin Fan; Sonja Jameson-Van Houten; Colleen G Julian; Jonathan Kark; Sherri Kark; Bengt Kayser; Julia P Kern; See Eun Kim; Corinna Lathan; Steven S Laurie; Andrew T Lovering; Ryan Paterson; David M Polaner; Benjamin J Ryan; James L Spira; Jack W Tsao; Nadine B Wachsmuth; Robert C Roach Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amador García-Ramos; Igor Štirn; Paulino Padial; Javier Argüelles-Cienfuegos; Blanca De la Fuente; Carmen Calderón; Juan Bonitch-Góngora; Katja Tomazin; Boro Strumbelj; Vojko Strojnik; Belén Feriche Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tobias Dünnwald; Hannes Gatterer; Martin Faulhaber; Marjan Arvandi; Wolfgang Schobersberger Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 4.566