OBJECTIVES: To assess the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test performance in the field and to evaluate a new rapid syphilis test (RST) as a primary screen for syphilis. METHODS: 1325 women of reproductive age from rural communities in the Gambia were tested for syphilis seropositivity using a RPR 18 mm circle card and a RST strip. Within 1 week a repeat RPR and a TPHA test were carried out using standard techniques in the laboratory. RESULTS: Comparing field tests to a diagnosis of "active" syphilis defined as laboratory RPR and TPHA positive, the RPR test was 77.5% sensitive and 94.1% specific; the RST was 75.0% sensitive and 95.2% specific. The RST was easier to use and interpret than the RPR test especially where field conditions were difficult. In this setting with a low prevalence of syphilis in the community (3%), the chance of someone with a positive test being confirmed as having serologically active syphilis was less than 50% for both tests. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriateness of syphilis screening using RPR testing in antenatal clinics and health centres should be questioned if there is a low prevalence in the population, conditions for testing are poor, and resources limited. There is still an urgent need for an appropriate rapid syphilis test for field use.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test performance in the field and to evaluate a new rapid syphilis test (RST) as a primary screen for syphilis. METHODS: 1325 women of reproductive age from rural communities in the Gambia were tested for syphilis seropositivity using a RPR 18 mm circle card and a RST strip. Within 1 week a repeat RPR and a TPHA test were carried out using standard techniques in the laboratory. RESULTS: Comparing field tests to a diagnosis of "active" syphilis defined as laboratory RPR and TPHA positive, the RPR test was 77.5% sensitive and 94.1% specific; the RST was 75.0% sensitive and 95.2% specific. The RST was easier to use and interpret than the RPR test especially where field conditions were difficult. In this setting with a low prevalence of syphilis in the community (3%), the chance of someone with a positive test being confirmed as having serologically active syphilis was less than 50% for both tests. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriateness of syphilis screening using RPR testing in antenatal clinics and health centres should be questioned if there is a low prevalence in the population, conditions for testing are poor, and resources limited. There is still an urgent need for an appropriate rapid syphilis test for field use.
Authors: F Jenniskens; E Obwaka; S Kirisuah; S Moses; F M Yusufali; J O Achola; L Fransen; M Laga; M Temmerman Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: J W Dorigo-Zetsma; D Belewu; H Meless; E Sanders; R A Coutinho; A Schaap; D Wolday Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: A J Herring; R C Ballard; V Pope; R A Adegbola; J Changalucha; D W Fitzgerald; E W Hook; A Kubanova; S Mananwatte; J W Pape; A W Sturm; B West; Y P Yin; R W Peeling Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Claire C Bristow; Segundo R Leon; Emily Huang; Lourdes B Ramos; Silver K Vargas; Juan A Flores; Kelika A Konda; Carlos F Caceres; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Lara E Pereira; Joshua McCormick; Tandin Dorji; Joseph Kang; Yongcheng Sun; Mayur Shukla; Andre Hopkins; John Deutsch; Ellen N Kersh; Kyle Bernstein; Yetunde F Fakile Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Claire C Bristow; Segundo R Leon; Emily Huang; Brandon J Brown; Lourdes B Ramos; Silver K Vargas; Juan A Flores; Carlos F Caceres; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Rosanna W Peeling; David Mabey; Mary L Kamb; Xiang-Sheng Chen; Justin D Radolf; Adele S Benzaken Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 52.329