Literature DB >> 12181392

Use of the health and activities limitation index as a measure of quality of life in obesity.

Edward H Livingston1, Clifford Y Ko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Obesity reduces the quality of life (QOL); however, quantification of obesity's impact on QOL is cumbersome. Utility indices reduce QOL measurements to a single numerical value that can be used in the calculation of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years and the cost effectiveness for obesity treatment. The purpose of this investigation is to assess the sensitivity of the Health and Activities Limitation Index (HALex) utility index to obesity. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The answers to five questions regarding an individual's self-perception of his or her health status and information about limitation in daily and work activities were collected from 32,440 adults in the 1998 National Health Information Survey. Answers to the questions were scored and converted to a utility index score ranging from 0 (near-death state) to 1 (perfect health) with no limitations. Average values for indices corresponding to differing body mass indices were obtained and significance determined by ANOVA.
RESULTS: The utility index for normal weight males and females was 0.86 +/- 0.19 and fell to 0.68 +/- 0.27 for superobese males and 0.60 +/- 0.28 in superobese females. Utility indices fell linearly with increasing body mass index and were lower for respondents having obesity-related comorbid conditions known to reduce the quality of life. DISCUSSION: There is a statistically significant decrease in the QOL with increasing obesity, slightly worse for women compared with men. The Health and Activities Limitation Index can quantitate the effect obesity and its complications have on quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12181392     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2002.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Res        ISSN: 1071-7323


  13 in total

1.  Changes of inflammatory mediators in obese patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Gaetano Di Vita; Rosalia Patti; Fausto Famà; Carmela Rita Balistreri; Giuseppina Candore; Calogero Caruso
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The impact of weight loss on health-related quality-of-life: implications for cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  Amy E Rothberg; Laura N McEwen; Andrew T Kraftson; Gina M Neshewat; Christine E Fowler; Charles F Burant; William H Herman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The role of the electronic medical record in the assessment of health related quality of life.

Authors:  Serguei V S Pakhomov; Nilay D Shah; Holly K Van Houten; Penny L Hanson; Steven A Smith
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

4.  Readability estimates for commonly used health-related quality of life surveys.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Honghu Liu; Marie N Fongwa; Leo S Morales; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Effects of dietary protein on the composition of weight loss in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  M M Gordon; M J Bopp; L Easter; G D Miller; M F Lyles; D K Houston; B J Nicklas; S B Kritchevsky
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  Lean mass loss is associated with low protein intake during dietary-induced weight loss in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Melanie J Bopp; Denise K Houston; Leon Lenchik; Linda Easter; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Barbara J Nicklas
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2008-07

7.  Video Ratings of Surgical Skill and Late Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher P Scally; Oliver A Varban; Arthur M Carlin; John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Effectiveness of web-based self-disclosure peer-to-peer support for weight loss: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mie Imanaka; Masahiko Ando; Tetsuhisa Kitamura; Takashi Kawamura
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Health state preferences associated with weight status in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Mandy B Belfort; John A F Zupancic; Katherine M Riera; Jane H G Turner; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Assessment of the health of Americans: the average health-related quality of life and its inequality across individuals and groups.

Authors:  Yukiko Asada
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2005-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.