Literature DB >> 12181271

Male breast carcinoma: correlation of ER, PR, Ki-67, Her2-Neu, and p53 with treatment and survival, a study of 65 cases.

Jessica Wang-Rodriguez1, Keith Cross, Scott Gallagher, Marcia Djahanban, Janet M Armstrong, Noel Wiedner, David H Shapiro.   

Abstract

Male breast cancer is rare, and experience of it in any single institution is limited. Our current understanding regarding its biology, natural history, and treatment strategies has been extrapolated from its female counterpart. The aim of this study is to evaluate the expression patterns of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), MiB1 (Ki67), Her-2/neu (c-erbB2), and p53 and to correlate them with the prognosis, presentation, staging, management, and survival/outcome in male breast carcinoma identified through the Veterans Administration nationwide cancer registry. Sixty-five cases of male breast cancer were reviewed for classification. Tumor blocks were requested from each institution for immunohistochemical staining and evaluation of ER, PR, p53, Her2-neu, and MiB1. Seventeen age- and disease-matched male veteran patients with breast gynecomastia were used as controls. Traditional prognostic data were collected for comparison with female breast cancers (i.e., age, lymph node status, clinical staging, tumor size, histological grade, and disease-free and overall survival). Male breast carcinoma had worse disease-free survival than controls (P =.03). The clinical stage regardless of tumor size or lymph node metastasis was the single most significant prognostic factor (P <.0001). ER-positive patients appeared to have a better survival than did ER-negative patients (P =.03, univariate; P not significant in multivariate) and did not benefit from treatment with tamoxifen (P =.0027, univariate; P =.42, multivariate). MiB1 and PR expressions did not correlate with treatment or survival, and p53 was associated with shorter disease free survival (P =.07, univariate; P =.047, multivariate). Stage for stage, Her2-neu was associated with shorter disease-free survival (P <.0001) and correlated with positive lymph nodes (P =.08). Surgery alone versus surgery with adjuvant treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, tamoxifen, or combination) did not show any survival difference. Adjuvant therapy seemed to be associated with worse outcome. In the Veterans Administration hospital setting, the clinical stage and the expressions of p53 and Her2-neu in male breast carcinoma may be prognostically useful markers in guiding future treatment in prospective studies, whereas ER, PR, and MiB1 expressions are of limited value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12181271     DOI: 10.1097/01.MP.0000022251.61944.1D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  25 in total

1.  Endocrine therapy for male breast cancer: rates of toxicity and adherence.

Authors:  H Visram; F Kanji; S F Dent
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of isolated pituitary metastasis from adenocarcinoma of unknown origin presenting as loss of libido.

Authors:  Julien Feghaly; George Astras
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-03-31

3.  Poorer survival outcomes for male breast cancer compared with female breast cancer may be attributable to in-stage migration.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gnerlich; Anjali D Deshpande; Donna B Jeffe; Susmitha Seelam; Eric Kimbuende; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Outcome of non-metastatic male breast cancer: 118 patients.

Authors:  Ulkü Yalçıntaş Arslan; Berna Oksüzoğlu; Nuriye Ozdemir; Sercan Aksoy; Necati Alkış; Ayşe Gök; Mehmet Ali Kaplan; Mahmut Gümüş; Veli Berk; Doğan Uncu; Meltem Baykara; Dilşen Colak; Ummügül Uyetürk; Ibrahim Türker; Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Expression of cell cycle proteins in male breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Rani Kanthan; Isabella Fried; Theresa Rueckl; Jenna-Lynn Senger; Selliah Chandra Kanthan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Are there biologic differences between male and female breast cancer explaining inferior outcome of men despite equal stage and treatment?!

Authors:  A-C Müller; C Gani; H M E Rehm; F Eckert; M Bamberg; T Hehr; M Weinmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  HER2-positive male breast cancer: an update.

Authors:  Laura Ottini; Carlo Capalbo; Piera Rizzolo; Valentina Silvestri; Giuseppe Bronte; Sergio Rizzo; Antonio Russo
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2010-10-04

8.  Male breast cancer-review of literature on a rare microscopic variant (oncocytic carcinoma).

Authors:  Nisha Jayashankar Marla; Muktha Ramesh Pai; Gumballi Krishnamurthy Swethadri; Hilda Fernandes
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Immunohistochemical characterization of subtypes of male breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Yimin Ge; Nour Sneige; Mahmoud A Eltorky; Zhiqin Wang; E Lin; Yun Gong; Ming Guo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Clinicopathological study of male breast carcinoma: 24 years of experience.

Authors:  Parveen Shah; Irfan Robbani; Omar Shah
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.