OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that identical twins show no inter-twin differences in cardiovascular structure or physiology in fetal life unless there has been twin-twin transfusion syndrome. DESIGN: Unselected prospective case-control observational study of fetoplacental haemodynamics including echocardiography at a median of 24 (16.7 to 32.3) weeks, with postnatal confirmation of congenital heart disease or normality. SETTING: Fetal medicine unit. PATIENTS: 136 women with monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies, of which 47 fetal twin pairs (35%) had twin-twin transfusion syndrome. RESULTS: There were no haemodynamic differences between the bigger fetus (twin 1) and the smaller co-twin (twin 2) in uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic pairs. In twin-twin transfusion syndrome, recipient fetuses had increased aortic and pulmonary velocities compared with their donor co-twins (mean (SD): 0.73 (0.23) m/s and 0.63 (0.14) m/s), respectively, v 0.53 (0.16) m/s and 0.48 (0.10) m/s in donor twins; p = 0.003 (aortic) and < 0.0001 (pulmonary)), and also in comparison with twin 1 and twin 2. The overall prevalence of congenital heart disease was increased above that in singletons (3.8% v 0.56%; 6.9% in twin-twin transfusion v 2.3% in uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins), with inter-twin discordance for defects. The prevalence in recipient twins was 11.9% (p = 0.014 v uncomplicated control twins). CONCLUSIONS: Fetuses with an identical genome but no circulatory imbalance have similar cardiovascular physiology but discordant phenotypic expression of congenital heart disease. The high prevalence of congenital heart disease in monochorionic diamniotic twins merits detailed fetal echocardiography.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that identical twins show no inter-twin differences in cardiovascular structure or physiology in fetal life unless there has been twin-twin transfusion syndrome. DESIGN: Unselected prospective case-control observational study of fetoplacental haemodynamics including echocardiography at a median of 24 (16.7 to 32.3) weeks, with postnatal confirmation of congenital heart disease or normality. SETTING: Fetal medicine unit. PATIENTS: 136 women with monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies, of which 47 fetal twin pairs (35%) had twin-twin transfusion syndrome. RESULTS: There were no haemodynamic differences between the bigger fetus (twin 1) and the smaller co-twin (twin 2) in uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic pairs. In twin-twin transfusion syndrome, recipient fetuses had increased aortic and pulmonary velocities compared with their donor co-twins (mean (SD): 0.73 (0.23) m/s and 0.63 (0.14) m/s), respectively, v 0.53 (0.16) m/s and 0.48 (0.10) m/s in donor twins; p = 0.003 (aortic) and < 0.0001 (pulmonary)), and also in comparison with twin 1 and twin 2. The overall prevalence of congenital heart disease was increased above that in singletons (3.8% v 0.56%; 6.9% in twin-twin transfusion v 2.3% in uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins), with inter-twin discordance for defects. The prevalence in recipient twins was 11.9% (p = 0.014 v uncomplicated control twins). CONCLUSIONS: Fetuses with an identical genome but no circulatory imbalance have similar cardiovascular physiology but discordant phenotypic expression of congenital heart disease. The high prevalence of congenital heart disease in monochorionic diamniotic twins merits detailed fetal echocardiography.
Authors: G R Saade; M A Belfort; D L Berry; T H Bui; L D Montgomery; A Johnson; M O'Day; G L Olson; H Lindholm; L Garoff; K J Moise Journal: Fetal Diagn Ther Date: 1998 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.587
Authors: J Burn; P Brennan; J Little; S Holloway; R Coffey; J Somerville; N R Dennis; L Allan; R Arnold; J E Deanfield; M Godman; A Houston; B Keeton; C Oakley; O Scott; E Silove; J Wilkinson; M Pembrey; A S Hunter Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-01-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jay D Pruetz; Sheree M Schrager; Tiffany V Wang; Arlyn Llanes; Ramen H Chmait; Douglas L Vanderbilt Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Anita J Moon-Grady; Larry Rand; Salvador Gallardo; Kristen Gosnell; Hanmin Lee; Vickie A Feldstein Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Alissa R Caton; Erin M Bell; Charlotte M Druschel; Martha M Werler; Angela E Lin; Marilyn L Browne; Louise-Anne McNutt; Paul A Romitti; Allen A Mitchell; Richard S Olney; Adolfo Correa Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Lisa Hui; Heather C Wick; Kenneth J Moise; Anthony Johnson; Francois Luks; Sina Haeri; Kirby L Johnson; Diana W Bianchi Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 3.050