Literature DB >> 12180821

The graft helps to define the character of the alloimmune response.

Alice A Bickerstaff1, Jiao-Jing Wang, Ronald P Pelletier, Charles G Orosz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In mice, kidney and liver allografts may be spontaneously accepted, whereas cardiac and skin allografts in the same strain combinations are rapidly rejected. The reasons for this dichotomy in murine response outcomes remains to be determined. METHODS AND
RESULTS: When DBA/2 (H-2d) cardiac allografts were placed in C57BL/6 (H-2b) recipients, they were rejected within 10 days, unless the allograft recipients were transiently treated with gallium nitrate (GN), at which time the allografts were accepted for > 150 days. The cardiac allograft rejector mice displayed DBA/2-reactive DTH responses, whereas the cardiac allograft acceptor mice displayed both TGFbeta- and IL10-mediated inhibition of DTH responses. In contrast, DBA/2 kidney allografts placed at the same location in C57BL/6 mice were spontaneously accepted without immunosuppression. These kidney allograft acceptor mice displayed TGFbeta-mediated, but not IL10-mediated inhibition of donor-reactive DTH responses.
CONCLUSIONS: In the DBA/2-> C57B1/6 strain combination, cardiac allografts induce pro-inflammatory immunity and allograft rejection, while kidney allografts induce anti-inflammatory immunity and allograft acceptance despite the fact that both organs display the same strong MHC disparities and are implanted at the same location. Anti-inflammatory immunity and allograft acceptance are displayed by cardiac allograft recipients when they are transiently treated with select immunosuppressants. Thus, multiple immune response options are available to the organ allograft recipient, and the choice is determined, to some degree, by the allograft, itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12180821     DOI: 10.1016/s0966-3274(02)00036-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Immunol        ISSN: 0966-3274            Impact factor:   1.708


  6 in total

Review 1.  Why some organ allografts are tolerated better than others: new insights for an old question.

Authors:  Travis D Hull; Gilles Benichou; Joren C Madsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 2.  Transplant tolerance: models, concepts and facts.

Authors:  Nicola J Monk; Roseanna E G Hargreaves; Elizabeth Simpson; Julian P Dyson; Stipo Jurcevic
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Spontaneous renal allograft acceptance associated with "regulatory" dendritic cells and IDO.

Authors:  Charles H Cook; Alice A Bickerstaff; Jiao-Jing Wang; Tibor Nadasdy; Patricia Della Pelle; Robert B Colvin; Charles G Orosz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  Organ-specific differences in achieving tolerance.

Authors:  Maria Lucia L Madariaga; Daniel Kreisel; Joren C Madsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Deficiency of C4 from donor or recipient mouse fails to prevent renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Tao Lin; Wuding Zhou; Conrad A Farrar; Roseanna E G Hargreaves; Neil S Sheerin; Steven H Sacks
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell-driven Induction of Treg Is Strain Specific and Correlates With Spontaneous Acceptance of Kidney Allografts.

Authors:  Nicholas A Oh; Thomas O'Shea; Dorothy K Ndishabandi; Qing Yuan; Shuahuan Hong; Jared Gans; Jifu Ge; Sean Gibney; Catharine Chase; Chao Yang; Ivy Rosales; Kazunobu Shinoda; Benjamin Drew; Lisa Kojima; Paul S Russell; Joren C Madsen; Robert B Colvin; Alessandro Alessandrini
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.385

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.