OBJECTIVE: To study whether clinical symptoms and signs can predict radiological osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip in primary care patients with hip pain. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 220) aged 50 years or older consulting the general practitioner for hip pain and referred for radiological investigation underwent a standardized history, radiological, laboratory, and physical examination. Radiological OA was confirmed with joint space < or = 2.5 mm. Additionally, a more stringent definition was used (< or = 1.5 mm). The relationship between radiological OA and possible clinical symptoms/signs of OA was tested. Combinations of clinical symptoms/signs that had shown an independent relationship with radiological OA in multivariate analyses were tested for their predictive value. RESULTS: Radiological OA (joint space < or = 2.5 mm) of the (more) symptomatic hip was present in 35.5% of the study population and more severe OA (joint space < or = 1.5 mm) in 11.4%. Presence of 4 specific symptoms/signs from history and examination showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 73% (specificity 91%, sensitivity 45%) for radiological OA. When 5 specific symptoms/signs were present, the PPV for the more severe radiological OA was 82% (specificity 98%, sensitivity 72%), and when 6 or 7 specific symptoms/signs were present the PPV was 100% (specificity 100%, sensitivity 40% and 8%, respectively). Negative predictive values were high for almost all combinations. CONCLUSION: In primary care patients with hip pain, clinical symptoms and signs can to a moderate extent predict radiological OA and to a large extent more severe radiological OA.
OBJECTIVE: To study whether clinical symptoms and signs can predict radiological osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip in primary care patients with hip pain. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 220) aged 50 years or older consulting the general practitioner for hip pain and referred for radiological investigation underwent a standardized history, radiological, laboratory, and physical examination. Radiological OA was confirmed with joint space < or = 2.5 mm. Additionally, a more stringent definition was used (< or = 1.5 mm). The relationship between radiological OA and possible clinical symptoms/signs of OA was tested. Combinations of clinical symptoms/signs that had shown an independent relationship with radiological OA in multivariate analyses were tested for their predictive value. RESULTS: Radiological OA (joint space < or = 2.5 mm) of the (more) symptomatic hip was present in 35.5% of the study population and more severe OA (joint space < or = 1.5 mm) in 11.4%. Presence of 4 specific symptoms/signs from history and examination showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 73% (specificity 91%, sensitivity 45%) for radiological OA. When 5 specific symptoms/signs were present, the PPV for the more severe radiological OA was 82% (specificity 98%, sensitivity 72%), and when 6 or 7 specific symptoms/signs were present the PPV was 100% (specificity 100%, sensitivity 40% and 8%, respectively). Negative predictive values were high for almost all combinations. CONCLUSION: In primary care patients with hip pain, clinical symptoms and signs can to a moderate extent predict radiological OA and to a large extent more severe radiological OA.
Authors: D Chu Miow Lin; W M Reichmann; L Gossec; E Losina; P G Conaghan; J F Maillefert Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Michael T Cibulka; Douglas M White; Judith Woehrle; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Keelan Enseki; Timothy L Fagerson; James Slover; Joseph J Godges Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Brian J Nguyen; Ashley Burt; Randall L Baldassarre; Edward Smitaman; Maud Morshedi; Steven Kao; Eric Y Chang; Sebastian Obrzut Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: A Amaro; L Sousa; L Sancho; J Meireles; S Calado; R Vitorino; F Amado; H J Appell; J A Duarte Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2004-07-29
Authors: David Metcalfe; Daniel C Perry; Henry A Claireaux; David L Simel; Cheryl K Zogg; Matthew L Costa Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Erik Poulsen; Henrik W Christensen; Ewa M Roos; Werner Vach; Søren Overgaard; Jan Hartvigsen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-05-04 Impact factor: 2.362