Literature DB >> 12177648

Role of target vessel size and body surface area on outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in women.

Warren J Cantor1, Julie M Miller, Anne S Hellkamp, Judith M Kramer, Eric D Peterson, Vic Hasselblad, James P Zidar, L Kristin Newby, E Magnus Ohman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women have higher mortality rates than men after coronary angioplasty. Differences in target vessel size may partially account for these differences. We set out to explore the effects of sex, body surface area (BSA), and target coronary vessel size on clinical outcomes after angioplasty.
METHODS: Data from 5 interventional trials and 1 registry were pooled for analysis (n = 3982).
RESULTS: Compared with men, women undergoing angioplasty were older, had lower weights and BSA, more coronary risk factors, and slightly smaller target coronary vessel size (as assessed by reference vessel diameter). The correlation between target vessel size and BSA was poor (r = 0.13). At 6 months, women had higher mortality rates (1.7% vs 0.8%, P =.03) but similar rates of myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. On univariate analysis, advanced age, smaller BSA, and female sex were associated with increased mortality, but target vessel size was not. Advanced age was the only significant multivariate predictor of mortality. Target vessel size and diabetes were independent predictors of repeat revascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: Women have higher unadjusted 6-month mortality rates after angioplasty, owing largely to their more advanced age at the time of intervention. Smaller target vessel size is associated with increased risk of restenosis and repeat revascularization; however, it does not appear to be a predictor for downstream mortality. As such, the fact that women have smaller vessels does not account for their higher 6-month mortality after coronary angioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12177648     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.123318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass.

Authors:  Amit K Hiteshi; Dong Li; Yanlin Gao; Andy Chen; Ferdinand Flores; Song Shou Mao; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Gender gap in acute coronary heart disease: Myth or reality?

Authors:  Mette Claassen; Kirsten C Sybrandy; Yolande E Appelman; Folkert W Asselbergs
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-26

Review 3.  Anatomy of coronary disease in diabetic patients: an explanation for poorer outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and potential target for intervention.

Authors:  K P Morgan; A Kapur; K J Beatt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Diagnosing and characterizing coronary artery disease in women: developments in noninvasive and invasive imaging techniques.

Authors:  Vivian G Ng; Stephanie Meller; Suchith Shetty; Alexandra J Lansky
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Gender influence in isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a propensity match score analysis of early outcomes.

Authors:  Bassel Suffian Al-Alao; Haralabos Parissis; Eilis McGovern; Michael Tolan; Vincent K Young
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-15

6.  Gender differences in management and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results on 20,290 patients from the AMIS Plus Registry.

Authors:  Dragana Radovanovic; Paul Erne; Philip Urban; Osmund Bertel; Hans Rickli; Jean-Michel Gaspoz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.