Literature DB >> 12177239

Chromogenic in situ hybridization: a novel approach to a practical and sensitive method for the detection of HER2 oncogene in archival human breast carcinoma.

Nadia Dandachi1, Otto Dietze, Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger.   

Abstract

The high incidence of HER2 overexpression on the cell surface of breast cancer cells and the recognized prognostic and potentially predictive value of HER2 render this cell surface receptor a novel and important therapeutic target. Although immunohistochemistry (IHC; HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; PathVysion and INFORM)-both approved by the Food and Drug Administration-have emerged as the most viable assays for evaluation of HER2 status in routine clinical practice, there is still no consensus on which is the best method for assessing HER2 status. Therefore, our specific objective was to establish a chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assay for the detection of HER2 amplification on a cohort of 173 archival invasive breast carcinomas. Results were compared with HercepTest, which is the most frequently used method for detecting HER2 alteration. Additionally, HER2 gene copy number was investigated using differential PCR (dPCR) as a testing system. HER2 overexpression was found by IHC in 24.3%; HER2 amplification was found by CISH in 19.1% and by dPCR in 9.2% of the tumors. The overall concordance rate was 95.9% between CISH and IHC and 85.0% between dPCR and IHC. Kappa statistics revealed an excellent agreement between IHC and CISH (kappa = 0.878), but only a moderate agreement was found between IHC and dPCR (kappa = 0.482). Discrepant cases between CISH and HercepTest and all IHC-positive cases (+2 and +3), a total of 42 cases, were analyzed with the FISH PathVysion (Vysis) assay. Among 25 HercepTest-positive cases (score +3), 2 showed no gene amplification by FISH or CISH. Four of 13 tumors with weak HER2 overexpression (score +2) were negative with both FISH and CISH. Concordance between CISH and FISH was 100% for the 38 cases analyzed. The current study showed that CISH represents a practical and simple assay for evaluating HER2 gene amplification in archival material, offering a promising alternative to IHC or FISH for the routine diagnostic setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12177239     DOI: 10.1097/01.lab.0000024360.48464.a4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  26 in total

1.  Novel bright field molecular morphology methods for detection of HER2 gene amplification.

Authors:  Raymond Tubbs; James Pettay; David Hicks; Marek Skacel; Richard Powell; Tom Grogan; James Hainfeld
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.611

2.  Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Di Palma; N Collins; C Faulkes; B Ping; G Ferns; B Haagsma; G Layer; M W Kissin; M G Cook
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization with other methodologies for HER2 status assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Nadia Dandachi
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.611

Review 4.  [Molecular methods in the diagnosis of sarcoma].

Authors:  S Merkelbach-Bruse; E Wardelmann; H Künstlinger; R Büttner; H-U Schildhaus
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Gene amplification and protein expression of EGFR and HER2 by chromogenic in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  H Awaya; Y Takeshima; O Furonaka; N Kohno; K Inai
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens.

Authors:  Tomás García-Caballero; Dorthe Grabau; Andrew R Green; John Gregory; Arno Schad; Elke Kohlwes; Ian O Ellis; Sarah Watts; Jens Mollerup
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 7.  Out of the darkness and into the light: bright field in situ hybridisation for delineation of ERBB2 (HER2) status in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Aaron M Gruver; Ziad Peerwani; Raymond R Tubbs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Real-time quantitative PCR of microdissected paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma: an alternative method for HER-2/neu analysis.

Authors:  Lise Mette Gjerdrum; Boe Sandahl Sorensen; Eigil Kjeldsen; Flemming Brandt Sorensen; Ebba Nexo; Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Fabíola E Rosa; Sara M Silveira; Cássia G T Silveira; Nádia A Bérgamo; Francisco A Moraes Neto; Maria A C Domingues; Fernando A Soares; José R F Caldeira; Silvia R Rogatto
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  HER-2/neu oncogene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization in 130 breast cancers using tissue microarray and clinical follow-up studies.

Authors:  Eundeok Chang; Anhi Lee; Eunjung Lee; Hekyung Lee; Okran Shin; Sejeong Oh; Changsuk Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.