Literature DB >> 12176866

A randomized multicenter comparison of bone marrow and peripheral blood in recipients of matched sibling allogeneic transplants for myeloid malignancies.

Stephen Couban1, David R Simpson, Michael J Barnett, Christopher Bredeson, Lothar Hubesch, Kang Howson-Jan, Tsiporah B Shore, Irwin R Walker, Peter Browett, Hans A Messner, Tony Panzarella, Jeffrey H Lipton.   

Abstract

Cytokine-mobilized peripheral blood is increasingly used instead of bone marrow as the source of cells for allogeneic transplantation. Although cells lead to faster hematologic recovery, their effects on graft-versus-host disease, relapse, and survival are less certain. Between January 1996 and February 2000, 228 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplasia were randomized to receive either bone marrow or peripheral blood allografts from HLA-matched siblings. All patients received busulfan and cyclophosphamide as conditioning chemotherapy and cyclosporine and methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. We compared the times to neutrophil and platelet recovery, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, relapse, and overall survival between the groups. The median times to neutrophil recovery were 19 days and 23 days and the times to platelet recovery were 16 days and 22 days in the peripheral blood and bone marrow groups, respectively (P <.0001 for both comparisons). The cumulative incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease 100 days after transplantation was 44% in both groups (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.49; P >.9), and the incidence of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease at 30 months after transplantation was 40% with peripheral blood and 30% with bone marrow (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.96; P =.37). There was no statistically significant difference in the probability of relapse of the underlying disease between the groups. The probabilities of survival at 30 months after transplantation were 68% and 60% in the peripheral blood and bone marrow groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.97; P =.04). In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, and myelodysplasia undergoing allogeneic transplantation from matched siblings, the use of peripheral blood instead of bone marrow leads to faster hematologic recovery, similar risk of graft-versus-host disease, and improved survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12176866     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  63 in total

Review 1.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a primer for the primary care physician.

Authors:  Chantal S Léger; Thomas J Nevill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Diverse clinical applications using advantages of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sang Kyun Sohn; Jong Gwang Kim; Dong Hwan Kim; Jin Ho Baek; Kyu Bo Lee
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  The hematopoietic system in the context of regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Christopher D Porada; Anthony J Atala; Graça Almeida-Porada
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Long-term outcome of patients given transplants of mobilized blood or bone marrow: A report from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Norbert Schmitz; Mary Eapen; Mary M Horowitz; Mei-Jie Zhang; John P Klein; J Douglas Rizzo; Fausto R Loberiza; Alois Gratwohl; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: from experimental biology to clinical care.

Authors:  Razvan Diaconescu; Rainer Storb
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Stem cell transplant for chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era.

Authors:  Jerald Radich
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.851

7.  Multi-institutional study of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as single-agent graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using myeloablative busulfan and fludarabine conditioning.

Authors:  Christopher G Kanakry; Paul V O'Donnell; Terry Furlong; Marcos J de Lima; Wei Wei; Marta Medeot; Marco Mielcarek; Richard E Champlin; Richard J Jones; Peter F Thall; Borje S Andersson; Leo Luznik
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Interpreting outcome data in hematopoietic cell transplantation for leukemia: tackling common biases.

Authors:  Y Ofran; H M Lazarus; A P Rapoport; J M Rowe
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  How I transplant a patient with a history of invasive fungal disease.

Authors:  Pedro Puerta-Alcalde; Richard Champlin; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Peripheral-blood stem cells versus bone marrow from unrelated donors.

Authors:  Claudio Anasetti; Brent R Logan; Stephanie J Lee; Edmund K Waller; Daniel J Weisdorf; John R Wingard; Corey S Cutler; Peter Westervelt; Ann Woolfrey; Stephen Couban; Gerhard Ehninger; Laura Johnston; Richard T Maziarz; Michael A Pulsipher; David L Porter; Shin Mineishi; John M McCarty; Shakila P Khan; Paolo Anderlini; William I Bensinger; Susan F Leitman; Scott D Rowley; Christopher Bredeson; Shelly L Carter; Mary M Horowitz; Dennis L Confer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.