Literature DB >> 12176794

A comparative analysis of cancer prevalence in cancer registry areas of France, Italy and Spain.

A Verdecchia1, A Micheli, M Colonna, V Moreno, M I Izarzugaza, E Paci.   

Abstract

A comparative analysis of cancer prevalence in France, Spain and Italy is presented as part of the EUROPREVAL project. The three countries are culturally and sociologically relatively homogeneous compared with Europe as a whole. However, in all three countries, the cancer registries (CRs) providing the data for prevalence calculation cover only small fractions of the populations, and have been operating for relatively short periods. This leads to problems of representativity and to prevalence underestimates as surviving cases diagnosed before operation of the CR are not recorded. Partial prevalences obtained directly from CR data were therefore corrected using a completeness index obtained by modelling to provide estimates of the complete prevalence. For CRs operating for only 5 years, only approximately half the prevalence was observed. Thus, due to the rather recent start of most of southern European CRs, the role of correction is very important. The prevalence of all cancers was highest in Italy for women and in France for men, while lowest in Spain. Differences in the age structures of the populations were the major cause of these discrepancies and after age adjustment only the prevalence of stomach cancer remained highest in Italy, although differences in incidence also contributed to the prevalence differences. Survival varied little between the three countries and differences in incidence are more important determinants of prevalence. Prevalence of cancer in the elderly represents an increasing load for the community, particularly for France, Italy and Spain due to the ageing population in these countries. Elderly patients with cancer frequently suffer from problems of co-morbidity and disability factors, thus placing a burden on the local medical system where this proportion is high. Prevalent cases diagnosed 1-5 years before the prevalence date formed approximately one-third of the total prevalence, with higher proportions for melanoma, and prostate cancer in males and breast and colorectal cancer in females, and lower proportions for uterine cancer. This subset of the prevalent population consists of those probably on intensive follow-up, or being treated for cancer recurrence or sequelae to primary therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12176794     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  8 in total

1.  Age-period-cohort modelling of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma incidence in a French region: a period effect compatible with an environmental exposure.

Authors:  Jean-François Viel; Evelyne Fournier; Arlette Danzon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 5.984

2.  No evidence for linkage with melanoma in Italian melanoma-prone families.

Authors:  Kimberly F Kerstann; Porcia T Bradford; Robert Steighner; Donato Calista; Maria Concetta Fargnoli; Ketty Peris; Maria Chiara Scaini; Chiara Menin; Paola Ghiorzo; Giovanna Bianchi-Scarra'; Alisa M Goldstein; Maria Teresa Landi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Expression of the proto-oncogene c-KIT in normal and tumor tissues from colorectal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Innocenzo Sammarco; Gabriele Capurso; Luigi Coppola; Antonio Paniccià Bonifazi; Sara Cassetta; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Alessandro Carrara; Giovanni Battista Grassi; Pellegrino Rossi; Claudio Sette; Raffaele Geremia
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  [Survival of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and monitored in primary care].

Authors:  Gabriel J Díaz Grávalos; Gerardo Palmeiro Fernández; Inmaculada Casado Górriz; Margarita Arandia García; Susana Alvarez Araújo; Mónica González Dacosta
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.137

5.  Does biliopancreatic diversion carry increased risk for colorectal cancer? A cohort study.

Authors:  Gian Franco Adami; Francesco S Papadia; Giuseppe M Marinari; Giovanni B Camerini; Nicola Scopinaro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Cancer in elderly: A study of hospital-based cancer registry in the Western Turkey.

Authors:  S Kilciksiz; Eb Yilmaz; S Yigit; A Baloglu
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.471

7.  Cancer prevalence in United States, Nordic Countries, Italy, Australia, and France: an analysis of geographic variability.

Authors:  E Crocetti; R De Angelis; C Buzzoni; A Mariotto; H Storm; M Colonna; R Zanetti; D Serraino; M Michiara; C Cirilli; A Iannelli; G Mazzoleni; O Sechi; M E Sanoja Gonzalez; S Guzzinati; R Capocaccia; L Dal Maso
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Estimating the prevalence of hematological malignancies and precursor conditions using data from Haematological Malignancy Research Network (HMRN).

Authors:  Jinlei Li; Alex Smith; Simon Crouch; Steven Oliver; Eve Roman
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.506

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.