B Chanrachakul1, Y Herabutya, P Punyavachira. 1. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. mgxbc@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the adverse effects of isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) compared with misoprostol for cervical ripening at term. METHODS:One hundred and seven women with term pregnancies referred for induction of labor with Bishop scores of 6 or less were randomly allocated to receive either a 40-mg IMN tabletvaginally (n = 55) or 50 microg misoprostolvaginally (n = 52) every 6 h for a maximum of three doses. They were sent to the labor ward for amniotomy or oxytocin if either their Bishop scores were more than 6 or their cervices were not ripe 24 h after the treatment. Adverse effects, progress, and outcomes of labor were assessed. RESULTS:Isosorbide mononitrate was associated with fewer adverse effects especially uterine tachysystole (0 vs. 19.2%, P < 0.01) and hyperstimulation (0 vs. 15.4%, P < 0.01). The time from start of medication to vaginal delivery in IMN group was significantly longer (25.6 +/- 6.1 vs. 14 +/- 6.9 h, P < 0.01). Oxytocin was needed in 51 women (92%) of the isosorbide mononitrate group and six women (11%) of the misoprostol group (P < 0.001). The cesarean rate was not significantly different between the groups, but the major indications were different: dystocia (45%) in the IMN group vs. persistent non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern (56%) in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical ripening with IMN resulted in fewer adverse effects, but was less effective than misoprostol.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To assess the adverse effects of isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) compared with misoprostol for cervical ripening at term. METHODS: One hundred and seven women with term pregnancies referred for induction of labor with Bishop scores of 6 or less were randomly allocated to receive either a 40-mg IMN tablet vaginally (n = 55) or 50 microg misoprostol vaginally (n = 52) every 6 h for a maximum of three doses. They were sent to the labor ward for amniotomy or oxytocin if either their Bishop scores were more than 6 or their cervices were not ripe 24 h after the treatment. Adverse effects, progress, and outcomes of labor were assessed. RESULTS:Isosorbide mononitrate was associated with fewer adverse effects especially uterine tachysystole (0 vs. 19.2%, P < 0.01) and hyperstimulation (0 vs. 15.4%, P < 0.01). The time from start of medication to vaginal delivery in IMN group was significantly longer (25.6 +/- 6.1 vs. 14 +/- 6.9 h, P < 0.01). Oxytocin was needed in 51 women (92%) of the isosorbide mononitrate group and six women (11%) of the misoprostol group (P < 0.001). The cesarean rate was not significantly different between the groups, but the major indications were different: dystocia (45%) in the IMN group vs. persistent non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern (56%) in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical ripening with IMN resulted in fewer adverse effects, but was less effective than misoprostol.
Authors: Shrikant Bollapragada; Fiona Mackenzie; John Norrie; Stavros Petrou; Margaret Reid; Ian Greer; Inass Osman; Jane E Norman Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2006-07-25 Impact factor: 3.007