Literature DB >> 12175611

The venom optimisation hypothesis: a spider injects large venom quantities only into difficult prey types.

Esther Wigger1, Lucia Kuhn-Nentwig, Wolfgang Nentwig.   

Abstract

The spider Cupiennius salei needs 0.01-10 microl venom to kill a prey item. Since its venom glands contain only 10 microl and regeneration requires 8-16 days C. salei should use its venom very economically. By a monoclonal antibody we measured, for the first time, the amounts of venom injected by a spider into different prey types. Crickets and stick insects, as victims without special defence mechanism, received only the minimum amount of venom which is not significantly different from the LD(50). Blowflies and ground beetles received considerably more venom because they are difficult to overwhelm or even endanger the spider by their defence behaviour. These results support our venom optimisation hypothesis which supposes that spiders use their venom as economically as possible. Copright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12175611     DOI: 10.1016/s0041-0101(01)00277-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  21 in total

1.  CSTX-13, a highly synergistically acting two-chain neurotoxic enhancer in the venom of the spider Cupiennius salei (Ctenidae).

Authors:  Benno Wullschleger; Lucia Kuhn-Nentwig; Jan Tromp; Urs Kämpfer; Johann Schaller; Stefan Schürch; Wolfgang Nentwig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The cost of chemical defence: the impact of toxin depletion on growth and behaviour of cane toads ( Rhinella marina).

Authors:  Ryann A Blennerhassett; Kim Bell-Anderson; Richard Shine; Gregory P Brown
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Why do we study animal toxins?

Authors:  Yun Zhang
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2015-07-18

4.  Comparison of the capture efficiency, prey processing, and nutrient extraction in a generalist and a specialist spider predator.

Authors:  Luis Fernando García; Carmen Viera; Stano Pekár
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-04-02

5.  Ontogenesis, gender, and molting influence the venom yield in the spider Coremiocnemis tropix (Araneae, Theraphosidae).

Authors:  Volker Herzig
Journal:  J Venom Res       Date:  2010-12-15

6.  Toxicity and utilization of chemical weapons: does toxicity and venom utilization contribute to the formation of species communities?

Authors:  Fabian L Westermann; Iain S McPherson; Tappey H Jones; Lesley Milicich; Philip J Lester
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Purification and Characterization of a Novel Insecticidal Toxin, μ-sparatoxin-Hv2, from the Venom of the Spider Heteropoda venatoria.

Authors:  Zhen Xiao; Yunxiao Zhang; Jiao Zeng; Songping Liang; Cheng Tang; Zhonghua Liu
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 8.  The Diversity of Venom: The Importance of Behavior and Venom System Morphology in Understanding Its Ecology and Evolution.

Authors:  Vanessa Schendel; Lachlan D Rash; Ronald A Jenner; Eivind A B Undheim
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Target-Driven Evolution of Scorpion Toxins.

Authors:  Shangfei Zhang; Bin Gao; Shunyi Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Response of Cellular Innate Immunity to Cnidarian Pore-Forming Toxins.

Authors:  Wei Yuen Yap; Jung Shan Hwang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.