Literature DB >> 12175355

Patient-controlled analgesia: what information does the patient want?

Gillian M Chumbley1, George M Hall, Peter Salmon.   

Abstract

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To formulate and evaluate an information leaflet for patients using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), incorporating information thought to be important by patients. RATIONALE: The benefit of current information leaflets, written by professionals, has not been studied and their value to patients is unknown.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that information leaflets were poorly designed and written in language too difficult for patients to understand. RESEARCH
METHODS: Seven focus groups were conducted to establish what information patients wanted to know about PCA. This information was incorporated into a new information leaflet. One hundred patients were randomized to receive either the new leaflet or the old leaflet in current use. A questionnaire was used to establish whether the new leaflet was more clear and informative than the old one.
RESULTS: Patients wanted to know that the drug used in PCA was morphine. They wanted more information about side-effects, needed to be reassured that it was safe, and that they could not overdose or become addicted. They wanted detailed instructions and diagrams about the technique. The questionnaire study established that the new leaflet was clearer and more informative.
CONCLUSION: Patients' contribution led to major change, producing a leaflet which was clearer, more attractive, more informative and which proved more satisfactory to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12175355     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02311.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  8 in total

Review 1.  Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens B Tempfer; Peter Nowak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  The development of an evidence-based patient booklet for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and un-instrumented decompression.

Authors:  A H McGregor; A K Burton; P Sell; G Waddell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does implementing a development plan for user participation in a mental hospital change patients' experience? A non-randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Marit B Rise; Aslak Steinsbekk
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material.

Authors:  E S Nilsen; H T Myrhaug; M Johansen; S Oliver; A D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

Review 5.  Community Engagement in Family Planning in the U.S.: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marion W Carter; Michelle L Tregear; Christina R Lachance
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Patient perspectives of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and methods for improving pain control and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Lance S Patak; Alan R Tait; Leela Mirafzali; Michelle Morris; Sunavo Dasgupta; Chad M Brummett
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 7.  Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.

Authors:  Dianne Lowe; Rebecca Ryan; Lina Schonfeld; Bronwen Merner; Louisa Walsh; Lisa Graham-Wisener; Sophie Hill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-15

8.  Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects.

Authors:  Louise K Wiles; Debra Kay; Julie A Luker; Anthea Worley; Jane Austin; Allan Ball; Alan Bevan; Michael Cousins; Sarah Dalton; Ellie Hodges; Lidia Horvat; Ellen Kerrins; Julie Marker; Michele McKinnon; Penelope McMillan; Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza; Judy Smith; David Yeung; Susan L Hillier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.