Helen D Bailey1, Carol Bower, Jay Krishnaswamy, Harvey L Coates. 1. Western Australian Newborn Hearing Screening Programme, Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, TVW Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, West Perth, Australia. helenb@ichr.uwa.edu.au
Abstract
AIM: To report the preliminary findings of a pilot program to screen newborn babies for congenital bilateral permanent hearing loss. SETTING: The five largest maternity hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. Screening was gradually introduced over seven months from February to August 2000. PARTICIPANTS: All babies born at these hospitals after the introduction of hearing screening until 30 June 2001. METHODS: One or both of two automated screening devices were used: one measuring transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and the other automated auditory brainstem responses (AABR). If a "pass" was not obtained in both ears, screening was repeated. All babies who did not obtain a pass in either ear at follow-up were referred for audiological assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of permanent bilateral hearing loss. RESULTS: Of 13 214 eligible babies, 12 708 (96.2%) received screening. The main reason for missing screening was early hospital discharge (309; 2.3%). Of the screened babies, 99% had a pass response in both ears at either the initial or follow-up screen. Twenty-three babies were referred for audiological assessment, and nine were diagnosed with bilateral permanent hearing loss (0.68/1000; 95% CI, 0.31-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Despite our program meeting process quality indicators, our detection rate was low. Before extending the program to smaller hospitals, we need to validate our screening instruments and put in place a system to monitor false negative results.
AIM: To report the preliminary findings of a pilot program to screen newborn babies for congenital bilateral permanent hearing loss. SETTING: The five largest maternity hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. Screening was gradually introduced over seven months from February to August 2000. PARTICIPANTS: All babies born at these hospitals after the introduction of hearing screening until 30 June 2001. METHODS: One or both of two automated screening devices were used: one measuring transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and the other automated auditory brainstem responses (AABR). If a "pass" was not obtained in both ears, screening was repeated. All babies who did not obtain a pass in either ear at follow-up were referred for audiological assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of permanent bilateral hearing loss. RESULTS: Of 13 214 eligible babies, 12 708 (96.2%) received screening. The main reason for missing screening was early hospital discharge (309; 2.3%). Of the screened babies, 99% had a pass response in both ears at either the initial or follow-up screen. Twenty-three babies were referred for audiological assessment, and nine were diagnosed with bilateral permanent hearing loss (0.68/1000; 95% CI, 0.31-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Despite our program meeting process quality indicators, our detection rate was low. Before extending the program to smaller hospitals, we need to validate our screening instruments and put in place a system to monitor false negative results.