Literature DB >> 12174922

Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) versus hormonal ablation with leuprorelin acetate as adjuvant treatment of node-positive, premenopausal breast cancer patients: preliminary results of the TABLE-study (Takeda Adjuvant Breast cancer study with Leuprorelin Acetate).

Peter Schmid1, Michael Untch, Diethelm Wallwiener, Valentin Kossé, Grigorij Bondar, Leonid Vassiljev, Valerie Tarutinov, Erika Kienle, Diana Lüftner, Kurt Possinger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of leuprorelin acetate in adjuvant treatment in comparison to standard chemotherapy with CMF in premenopausal, estrogen-receptor-positive or unknown, node-positive patients with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 years of hormone ablation with leuprorelin acetate 11.25 mg as a subcutaneous injection every three months or six courses of CMF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, days 1 and 8, q 4 weeks). The primary study end-point was recurrence-free survival (RFS) after 2 years. Secondary end-points included overall survival, adverse events and hormonal suppression.
RESULTS: Between 1995 and 1999, a total of 589 patients with breast cancer were randomized to treatment with leuprorelin acetate or CMF. The data of 227 patients were available for this first interim analysis. One hundred and ten and 117 patients were assigned to leuprorelin acetate and chemotherapy, respectively. Both treatment arms were well balanced for baseline characteristics. So far, no difference between the groups has emerged with respect to recurrence-free or overall survivaL Suppression of serum estradiol levels and menstruation was less marked in the CMF-group compared to the leuprorelin arm. The most common adverse events were low-grade hot flushes, weight gain and increased sweating in the leuprorelin-treated patients and alopecia, nausea and vomiting in the CMF-group.
CONCLUSION: According to these preliminary results, ovarian suppression with leuprorelin acetate was as effective as standard chemotherapy for premenopausal women with hormone-sensitive, node-positive early breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12174922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  10 in total

Review 1.  Trends in endocrine therapy and chemotherapy for early breast cancer: a focus on the premenopausal patient.

Authors:  W Jonat; K I Pritchard; R Sainsbury; J G Klijn
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Adjuvant endocrine therapy of premenopausal women with early breast cancer: an overview.

Authors:  Michael Hubalek; Christine Brantner; Christian Marth
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-04

3.  Phase III comparison of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (E-3193, INT-0142): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Amye J Tevaarwerk; Molin Wang; Fengmin Zhao; John H Fetting; David Cella; Lynne I Wagner; Silvana Martino; James N Ingle; Joseph A Sparano; Lawrence J Solin; William C Wood; Nicholas J Robert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Postoperative endocrine therapy for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Leisha A Emens; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2009

Review 5.  What is the current status of ovarian suppression/ablation in women with premenopausal early-stage breast cancer?

Authors:  Michaela J Higgins; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  LHRH agonists for adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Shom Goel; Rohini Sharma; Anne Hamilton; Jane Beith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

Review 7.  Adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shannon Puhalla; Adam Brufsky; Nancy Davidson
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  A randomised factorial trial of sequential doxorubicin and CMF vs CMF and chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  S De Placido; M De Laurentiis; M De Lena; V Lorusso; A Paradiso; M D'Aprile; G Pistillucci; A Farris; M G Sarobba; S Palazzo; L Manzione; V Adamo; S Palmeri; F Ferraù; R Lauria; C Pagliarulo; G Petrella; G Limite; R Costanzo; A R Bianco
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Ovarian suppression for adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  Kim Tam Bui; Melina L Willson; Shom Goel; Jane Beith; Annabel Goodwin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-03-06

Review 10.  Breast cancer follow-up strategies in randomized phase III adjuvant clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabella Sperduti; Patrizia Vici; Nicola Tinari; Teresa Gamucci; Michele De Tursi; Giada Cortese; Antonino Grassadonia; Stefano Iacobelli; Clara Natoli
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.