Literature DB >> 12173836

Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: results of first 300 patients.

Mark W Connolly1, Lisa D Torrillo, Michael J Stauder, Nilesh U Patel, John C McCabe, Didier F Loulmet, Valavanur A Subramanian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the expanded use of the radial artery as a bypass conduit in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, an endoscopic radial artery harvesting method was used to improve esthetics and patient acceptance, and possibly, to decrease hand neurologic complications.
METHODS: After informed consent and confirmation of adequate ulnar collateral blood flow, 300 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting had their nondominant radial artery endoscopically removed through a small 3-cm incision just proximal to the radial styloid prominence. Standard endoscopic vein equipment (30-degree 5-mm endoscope, subcutaneous retractor, and vessel dissector) with ultrasonic harmonic coagulating shears were used. After radial artery isolation, the radial artery was proximally clipped and transected 1 to 2 cm distal to the visualized ulnar artery origin to the inferior end of the wrist incision.
RESULTS: The mean age was 62.2 years; 23% of the patients were women, 39% had diabetes mellitus, and 28% had peripheral vascular disease. All 300 endoscopic radial arteries were grossly acceptable and used for grafting. Early in the series, 29 patients (9.7%) required a second 3-cm incision proximally for vascular control. Only one wrist incision was required at the last 200 cases. The conduit length varied between 18 and 24 cm. Occurring early in the series, hospital complications were two tunnel hematomas requiring drainage and one brachial artery clipping repaired primarily without sequela. At 30 days postoperative follow-up, 5 patients (1.6%) had been treated with oral antibiotics for incisional cellulitis and 26 patients (8.7%) had objective dorsal thenar sensory numbness. No ischemic hand complication, perioperative myocardial infarction, reintervention in radial artery graft distribution, or numbness in the lateral forearm occurred. All patients expressed marked satisfaction with the small incision and cosmetic result.
CONCLUSIONS: In our initial experience, endoscopic radial artery harvesting can be performed safely, with minor, infrequent complications. A full-length radial artery conduit can be obtained with improved esthetics and patient satisfaction and acceptance. Late dorsal thenar paresthesias, although infrequent, continue to be a problem as with the open method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12173836     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03717-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Graft harvesting for revascularization in the head and neck.

Authors:  Terence E Johnson; John E Wanebo; Stephen W Bayles; Charles Y Liu
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2005-08

2.  Endoscopic radial artery harvesting procedure for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  José L Navia; Gabriel Olivares; Paul Ehasz; A Marc Gillinov; Lars G Svensson; Nicolas Brozzi; Bruce Lytle
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

3.  Open radial artery harvesting better preserves endothelial function compared to the endoscopic approach.

Authors:  Mario F Gaudino; Roberto Lorusso; Lucas B Ohmes; Navneet Narula; Patrick McIntire; Antonella Gargiulo; Maria Rosaria Bucci; Jeremy Leonard; Mohamed Rahouma; Antonino Di Franco; Guo-Wei He; Leonard N Girardi; Robert F Tranbaugh; Annarita Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-10-01

4.  Limb performance and patient satisfaction after radial artery harvesting: endoscopic versus open techniques.

Authors:  Benjamin Medalion; Avraham Fuks; Erez Sharoni; Alon Stamler; Eitan Snir; Bernardo Vidne; Eyal Porat
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial.

Authors:  Christian L Carranza; Martin Ballegaard; Mads U Werner; Philip Hasbak; Andreas Kjær; Klaus F Kofoed; Jane Lindschou; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Christian Gluud; Peter Skov Olsen; Daniel A Steinbrüchel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.