Literature DB >> 12173524

Oculocentric frames of reference for limb movement.

K C Engel1, M Flanders, J F Soechting.   

Abstract

We have reviewed evidence that suggests that the target for limb motion is encoded in a retinocentric frame of reference. Errors in pointing that are elicited by an illusion that distorts the perceived motion of a target are strongly correlated with errors in gaze position. The modulations in the direction and speed of ocular smooth pursuit and of the hand show remarkable similarities, even though the inertia of the arm is much larger than that of the eye. We have suggested that ocular motion is constrained so that gaze provides an appropriate target signal for the hand. Finally, ocular and manual tracking deficits in patients with cerebellar ataxia are very similar. These deficits are also consistent with the idea that a gaze signal provides the target for hand motion; in some cases limb ataxia would be a consequence of optic ataxia rather than reflecting a deficit in the control of limb motion per se. These results, as well as neurophysiological data summarized here, have led us to revise a hypothesis we have previously put forth to account for the initial stages of sensorimotor transformations underlying targeted limb motions. In the original hypothesis, target location and initial arm posture were ultimately encoded in a common frame of reference tied to somatosensation, i.e. a body-centered frame of reference, and a desired change in posture was derived from the difference between the two. In our new scheme, a movement vector is derived from the difference between variables encoded in a retinocentric frame of reference. Accordingly, gaze, with its exquisite ability to stabilize a target image even under dynamic conditions, would be used as a reference signal. Consequently, this scheme would facilitate the processing of information under conditions in which the body and the target are moving relative to each other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12173524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ital Biol        ISSN: 0003-9829            Impact factor:   1.000


  7 in total

1.  Changes in head and neck position affect elbow joint position sense.

Authors:  Joanna J Knox; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sensory transformations and the use of multiple reference frames for reach planning.

Authors:  Leah M M McGuire; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations.

Authors:  Parisa Abedi Khoozani; Dimitris Voudouris; Gunnar Blohm; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Multi-sensory weights depend on contextual noise in reference frame transformations.

Authors:  Jessica Katherine Burns; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Quantifying effects of stochasticity in reference frame transformations on posterior distributions.

Authors:  Hooman Alikhanian; Schubert R de Carvalho; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Response Properties of Motor Equivalence Neurons of the Primate Premotor Cortex.

Authors:  Eleftherios Neromyliotis; A K Moschovakis
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Waiting for a hand: saccadic reaction time increases in proportion to hand reaction time when reaching under a visuomotor reversal.

Authors:  Irene T Armstrong; Melissa Judson; Douglas P Munoz; Roland S Johansson; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.