Literature DB >> 12173259

Student and mentor perceptions of mentoring effectiveness.

M Andrews1, F Chilton.   

Abstract

The following is an account of a small pilot study conducted over a 3-month period which ascertained the views of staff nurses and students about the mentoring process. In particular, whether the possession of a teaching qualification influences the effectiveness of mentors. The research was conducted in a district general hospital in North Wales. The findings demonstrate that staff nurses with a teaching and assessing qualification consistently rate themselves as more effective and supportive than those without. Other findings show that students consistently rate their mentors positively irrespective of whether they held a teaching and assessing qualification and that students rate their mentors more positively than the mentors themselves. Although these findings are not generalizable in the accepted sense they may be applicable to other practice settings. The findings and discussion indicate several implications for future practice including the need for: More consistency in practice regarding the nature and purpose of mentorship Clear criteria and selection processes for potential mentors, including more extensive use of the Measuring Mentor Potential (MMP) scale as a predictive tool A review of current mentor preparation programmes to align them with the needs of diploma and degree students and to ensure comparability of standards throughout the UK More discussion regarding the nature and purpose of mentorship including further examination of a range of mentorship models.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 12173259     DOI: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  5 in total

1.  Graduate-Assistant Athletic Trainers' Perceptions of the Supervisor's Role in Professional Socialization: Part II.

Authors:  Ashley B Thrasher; Stacy E Walker; Dorice A Hankemeier; Thalia Mulvihill
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The Mentoring Competency Assessment: validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors.

Authors:  Michael Fleming; Stephanie House; Vansa Shewakramani Hanson; Lan Yu; Jane Garbutt; Richard McGee; Kurt Kroenke; Zainab Abedin; Doris M Rubio
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Medical student and academic staff perceptions of role models: an analytical cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ali A Haghdoost; Mohammad R Shakibi
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Psychometric properties of the mentor behaviour scale in a sample of Malaysian medical students.

Authors:  Jamilah A M Mohammad; Muhamad S B Yusoff
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-15

5.  A new Mentor Evaluation Tool: Evidence of validity.

Authors:  Michi Yukawa; Stuart A Gansky; Patricia O'Sullivan; Arianne Teherani; Mitchell D Feldman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.