Literature DB >> 12173015

Solitary pulmonary nodules: accuracy and cost-effectiveness of sodium iodide FDG-PET using Australian data.

C J Keith1, K A Miles, M R Griffiths, D Wong, A G Pitman, R J Hicks.   

Abstract

This study uses Australian data to confirm the accuracy of dedicated sodium iodide (NaI) fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in evaluating indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) and to determine the conditions under which PET could play a cost-effective role in this evaluation. Ninety-two patients from two Australian hospitals in different states underwent FDG-PET for evaluation of an SPN. Observed values for prior probability of malignancy and diagnostic accuracy of PET were applied to previously published decision tree models using published Australian health care costs. The accuracy of FDG-PET was 93% with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 95%. The prior probability of malignancy (0.54), PET sensitivity and PET specificity indicated cost savings per patient of up to EUR 455 (Adollars 774) based on a PET cost of EUR 706 (Adollars 1,200). PET would remain cost-effective for levels of prior probability up to 0.8-0.9 and a PET cost of EUR 736-1,161 (Adollars 1,252-Adollars 1,974). It is concluded that NaI PET is accurate, cost saving and cost-effective for the characterisation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules in Australia. Comparison with previous reports from the United States confirms that FDG-PET can remain cost-effective despite population differences in medical costs, disease prevalence and PET diagnostic performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12173015     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-002-0833-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  11 in total

1.  [18F]FDG uptake and PCNA, Glut-1, and Hexokinase-II expressions in cancers and inflammatory lesions of the lung.

Authors:  Marcelo Mamede; Tatsuya Higashi; Masanori Kitaichi; Koichi Ishizu; Takayoshi Ishimori; Yuji Nakamoto; Kazuhiro Yanagihara; Mio Li; Fumihiro Tanaka; Hiromi Wada; Toshiaki Manabe; Tsuneo Saga
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  The value of BAL fluid LDH level in differentiating benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Ali Emad; Vahid Emad
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kelvin K Yap; Kenneth S K Yap; Amanda J Byrne; Salvatore U Berlangieri; Aurora Poon; Paul Mitchell; Simon R Knight; Peter C Clarke; Anthony Harris; Andrew Tauro; Christopher C Rowe; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Impact of FDG-PET for staging of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Imdahl; M Hentschel; M Kleimaier; U T Hopt; I Brink
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study.

Authors:  Paul Verboom; Harm van Tinteren; Otto S Hoekstra; Egbert F Smit; Jan H A M van den Bergh; Ad J M Schreurs; Roland A L M Stallaert; Piet C M van Velthoven; Emile F I Comans; Fred W Diepenhorst; Johan C van Mourik; Pieter E Postmus; Maarten Boers; Els W M Grijseels; Gerrit J J Teule; Carin A Uyl-de Groot
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in areas with infectious lung disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephen A Deppen; Jeffrey D Blume; Clark D Kensinger; Ashley M Morgan; Melinda C Aldrich; Pierre P Massion; Ronald C Walker; Melissa L McPheeters; Joe B Putnam; Eric L Grogan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Modern diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiology in lung cancer.

Authors:  Wai-Kit Lee; Eddie W F Lau; Kwang Chin; Oliver Sedlaczek; Karin Steinke
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Cancer imaging: is it cost-effective?

Authors:  K A Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  PET/CT: will it change the way that we use CT in cancer imaging?

Authors:  Rodney J Hicks; Robert E Ware; Eddie W F Lau
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the management of lung cancer: An update.

Authors:  Punit Sharma; Harmandeep Singh; Sandip Basu; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.