Literature DB >> 12172688

Differential effects of amitriptyline, nefazodone and paroxetine on performance and brain indices of visual selective attention and working memory.

M W van Laar1, E R Volkerts, M N Verbaten, S Trooster, H J van Megen, J L Kenemans.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Antidepressants may vary widely in their potential to impair cognitive and psychomotor functions. Little is known about their effects on event-related brain potentials (ERPs).OBJECTIVES. To compare the effects of three pharmacologically different antidepressants on performance and ERPs in tasks of selective attention and working memory.
METHODS: Subjects were treated for 8 days with amitriptyline (sedative/anticholinergic TCA), nefazodone (5-HT(2) receptor antagonist), paroxetine (SSRI) and placebo, in a double-blind, crossover design. Measurements were carried out on day 1 and 8 of each treatment period. A task was used in which memory load (two and four items) and attention (focused, divided) were orthogonally varied.
RESULTS: On day 1 amitriptyline increased reaction times (focused attention) and the percentage of misses (load 4>load 2) and false alarms. Sensitivity (A') was reduced as a function of memory load. Effects were greatly diminished on day 8. The ERP analysis yielded a reduced early frontal positive difference wave related to memory load (day 1). Attention-related search negativity was slightly prolonged. P3 latency (stimulus evaluation time) was prolonged. P3 amplitude was reduced (mainly on day 8) suggesting diminished attention capacity. Nefazodone increased reaction times and miss rates and reduced sensitivity (A') on day 8 only. Paroxetine speeded responses on day 1 and slightly increased miss rates on day 8. Performance effects of nefazodone and paroxetine did not interact with the task factors. Search negativity and P3 measures were not affected.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the pharmacologically selective serotonergic antidepressants lack the specific memory and attention deficits seen with amitriptyline. Both performance and ERP data suggest that paroxetine and nefazodone may influence response-related processes, while for nefazodone an effect on other processes cannot be excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12172688     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-002-1116-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  11 in total

Review 1.  How human electrophysiology informs psychopharmacology: from bottom-up driven processing to top-down control.

Authors:  J Leon Kenemans; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Acute and subchronic effects of amitriptyline on processing capacity in neuropathic pain patients using visual event-related potentials: preliminary findings.

Authors:  D S Veldhuijzen; J L Kenemans; A J M van Wijck; B Olivier; C J Kalkman; E R Volkerts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  A systematic review of amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment induced by anticholinergic, antihistamine, GABAergic and opioid drugs.

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum; Amélie Paquette; Sarah Hilmer; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc; Ryan Carnahan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Effects of acute and chronic antidepressant treatments on memory performance: a comparison between paroxetine and imipramine.

Authors:  Laurent Naudon; Maïté Hotte; Thérèse M Jay
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Psychoactive medication use and neurocognitive function in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor study.

Authors:  Tara M Brinkman; Nan Zhang; Nicole J Ullrich; Pim Brouwers; Daniel M Green; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Marilyn Stovall; Leslie L Robison; Kevin R Krull
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Inflexible minds: impaired attention switching in recent-onset schizophrenia.

Authors:  Henderikus G O M Smid; Sander Martens; Marc R de Witte; Richard Bruggeman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Improved planning abilities in binge eating.

Authors:  Rémi Neveu; Dorine Neveu; Franck Barsumian; Elsa Fouragnan; Edouard Carrier; Massimo Lai; Jocelyne Sultan; Alain Nicolas; Giorgio Coricelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Preference for Safe Over Risky Options in Binge Eating.

Authors:  Rémi Neveu; Elsa Fouragnan; Franck Barsumian; Edouard Carrier; Massimo Lai; Alain Nicolas; Dorine Neveu; Giorgio Coricelli
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 9.  Influence of Pharmacotherapy on Cognitive Functions in Depression: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Agata Orzechowska; Maria Filip; Piotr Gałecki
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-11-24

10.  Cognitive dysfunctions and psychological symptoms in migraine without aura: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gabriella Santangelo; Antonio Russo; Luigi Trojano; Fabrizia Falco; Laura Marcuccio; Mattia Siciliano; Francesca Conte; Federica Garramone; Alessandro Tessitore; Gioacchino Tedeschi
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.