Literature DB >> 12171836

Quality of life following lung cancer resection: video-assisted thoracic surgery vs thoracotomy.

Wilson W L Li1, T W Lee, Shirley S Y Lam, Calvin S H Ng, Alan D L Sihoe, Innes Y P Wan, Anthony P C Yim.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Quality of life (QOL) following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) major lung resection has not been systematically studied. This study was designed to evaluate the intermediate to long-term QOL in patients with lung cancer following resection, comparing VATS with thoracotomy.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, telephone survey.
METHODS: Of 136 disease-free surviving patients with non-small cell lung cancer operated on between 1994 and 2000, 45 patients were excluded because of large tumors (> 5 cm) or locally advanced disease, and another 27 patients were excluded because of adjuvant therapy, coexisting cancer from another source, or psychiatric illness. At the time of the survey, 13 patients were found to be either unsuitable or unwilling to participate. This left a total of 51 patients, with 27 patients in the VATS group and 24 patients in the thoracotomy group (open group), for the final analysis. QOL was assessed using Chinese versions of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-LC13, supplemented with nine self-developed surgery-related questions.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 33.5 months in the VATS group (median, 20.8 months; range, 6.0 to 84.2 months) and 39.4 months in the open group (median, 37.7 months; range, 7.0 to 75.1 months). Both groups had good QOL and high levels of functioning despite a fairly high incidence of symptoms. There was a trend for VATS patients to score higher on the QOL and functioning scales and to report fewer symptoms. However, these differences did not lead to statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that lung cancer patients with resectable disease following surgical treatment without recurrence have good QOL and high levels of functioning on intermediate to long-term follow-up, with no significant differences between the VATS and open groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12171836     DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.2.584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  45 in total

Review 1.  Uniportal VATS in Asia.

Authors:  Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Quality-of-life outcomes for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized trial, JBR.10.

Authors:  Andrea Bezjak; Christopher W Lee; Keyue Ding; Michael Brundage; Timothy Winton; Barbara Graham; Marlo Whitehead; David H Johnson; Robert B Livingston; Lesley Seymour; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Surgical Outcome of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery vs. Thoracotomy for Primary Lung Cancer >5 cm in Diameter.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Nakano; Shunsuke Endo; Tetsuya Endo; Shinichi Otani; Hiroyoshi Tsubochi; Shinichi Yamamoto; Kenji Tetsuka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 4.  The evolution of minimally invasive thoracic surgery: implications for the practice of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Alan D L Sihoe
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Minimally invasive thoracic surgery: beyond surgical access.

Authors:  Max K H Wong; Alva K Y Sit; Timmy W K Au
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Reasons not to perform uniportal VATS lobectomy.

Authors:  Alan D L Sihoe
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Recent developments in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary nodule management.

Authors:  Simon C Y Chow; Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  How to manage tumor located between upper division and lingular segment "S3+S4 segmentectomy and S3b+S4 segmentectomy".

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Yamashita; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Daisuke Hamatake; Takeshi Shiraishi; Katsunobu Kawahara; Akinori Iwasaki
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Is single-station N2 disease on PET-CT an indication for primary surgery in lung cancer patients?

Authors:  Janusz Kowalewski; Tomasz J Szczęsny
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Response to "VATS vs. thoracotomy regarding postoperative chronic pain".

Authors:  Emine Ozgur Bayman; Kalpaj R Parekh; John Keech; Timothy J Brennan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.