Literature DB >> 12171622

Unit costs for house spraying and bednet impregnation with residual insecticides in Colombia: a management tool for the control of vector-borne disease.

A Kroeger1, C Ayala, A Medina Lara.   

Abstract

A study of unit costs and cost components of two malaria-control strategies (house spraying and bednet impregnation with residual insecticides) was undertaken in 11 malaria-endemic states (departamentos) of Colombia, using data provided by control staff on self-administered questionnaires. The accuracy of the data was verified by personal visits, telephone conversations and complementary information from 10 other states. Allthe financial-cost components of the malaria-control operations carried out in the previous 6 months and the results of the control operations themselves (including the numbers of houses sprayed and numbers of bednets impregnated/day) were recorded. The information was stratified according to whether the target communities were 'near' or 'far away' from an operational base, the far-away communities being those that needed overnight stays by the control staff. The main variables analysed were unit costs/house treated, and annual cost/person protected. The results show that house spraying was generally more expensive for the health services than bednet impregnation. This is particularly the case in 'nearby' communities, where most of those at-risk live. In such communities, spraying one house was 7.2 times more expensive than impregnating one bednet. Even if only those sleeping under an impregnated net were assumed to be protected, the unit costs/person protected in a 'nearby' community were twice as high for house spraying than for bednet impregnation. In 'nearby' communities, where technicians could return to the operational base each evening, insecticides made up 80% of the total spraying costs and 42% of the costs of bednet impregnation. In 'far-away' communities, however, salaries and 'per diems' were the most important cost components, representing, respectively, 23% and 22% of the costs of spraying, and 34% plus 27% of the costs of impregnation. Insecticide wastage and non-use of discounts on insecticide prices (available through the national Ministry of Health) increased the overall costs considerably. The multiple uses of these cost calculations for district health managers are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12171622     DOI: 10.1179/000349802125001159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol        ISSN: 0003-4983


  10 in total

1.  Comparative field trial of alternative vector control strategies for non-domiciliated Triatoma dimidiata.

Authors:  Jhibran Ferral; Leysi Chavez-Nuñez; Maria Euan-Garcia; Maria Jesus Ramirez-Sierra; M Rosario Najera-Vazquez; Eric Dumonteil
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Community-wide benefits of targeted indoor residual spray for malaria control in the western Kenya highland.

Authors:  Guofa Zhou; Andrew K Githeko; Noboru Minakawa; Guiyun Yan
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 2.979

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Indoor Residual Spraying of Households with Insecticide for Malaria Prevention and Control in Tanzania.

Authors:  Rachel Stelmach; Rajeev Colaço; Shabbir Lalji; Deborah McFarland; Richard Reithinger
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Costing the distribution of insecticide-treated nets: a review of cost and cost-effectiveness studies to provide guidance on standardization of costing methodology.

Authors:  Jan Kolaczinski; Kara Hanson
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Community cooperatives and insecticide-treated materials for malaria control: a new experience in Latin America.

Authors:  Axel Kroeger; Ana Aviñna; José Ordoñnez-Gonzalez; Celia Escandon
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 6.  Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Plasmodium vivax Control.

Authors:  Michael T White; Shunmay Yeung; Edith Patouillard; Richard Cibulskis
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Dengue vector management using insecticide treated materials and targeted interventions on productive breeding-sites in Guatemala.

Authors:  Nidia Rizzo; Rodrigo Gramajo; Maria Cabrera Escobar; Byron Arana; Axel Kroeger; Pablo Manrique-Saide; Max Petzold
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Cost-effectiveness of chagas disease vector control strategies in Northwestern Argentina.

Authors:  Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec; Cynthia Spillmann; Mario Zaidenberg; Uriel Kitron; Ricardo E Gürtler
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2009-01-20

9.  The costs of preventing and treating chagas disease in Colombia.

Authors:  Marianela Castillo-Riquelme; Felipe Guhl; Brenda Turriago; Nestor Pinto; Fernando Rosas; Mónica Flórez Martínez; Julia Fox-Rushby; Clive Davies; Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2008-11-18

10.  A voluntary use of insecticide treated nets can stop the vector transmission of Chagas disease.

Authors:  Cheol Yong Han; Habeeb Issa; Jan Rychtář; Dewey Taylor; Nancy Umana
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-11-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.