Literature DB >> 12171105

Sensory contributions to the control of stance: a posture control model.

Thomas Mergner1, Christoph Maurer, Robert J Peterka.   

Abstract

We present the outline of a dual kinetic-kinematic postural control model. It is based on concepts of inter-sensory interaction (sensor fusion) which we consider instrumental for sensorimotor integration. Separation into kinetic and kinematic control signals begins at the level of the sensors (e.g., vestibular system--otoliths: force field meters, canals: head angular speedometers). Sensor fusion mechanisms are used to yield separate internal representations for foot support kinematics, force fields such as gravity, and contact forces such as pull or push having impact on the body. These representations are fed as global set point signals into local proprioceptive control loops of the joints. Fed into an ankle joint proprioceptive loop for body-on-support stabilization, they yield compensation of support tilt, gravity and contact forces, even when these stimuli are combined and, furthermore, voluntary lean is superimposed. Model simulations parallel our experimental findings so far obtained.

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12171105     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0713-0_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  17 in total

1.  Processing time of addition or withdrawal of single or combined balance-stabilizing haptic and visual information.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Spatial and temporal analyses of posture in strabismic children.

Authors:  Marie-Désirée Ezane; Cynthia Lions; Emmanuel Bui Quoc; Chantal Milleret; Maria Pia Bucci
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Differences in preferred reference frames for postural orientation shown by after-effects of stance on an inclined surface.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Fay B Horak; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Human control of an inverted pendulum: is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Henrik Gollee; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Body sway adaptation to addition but not withdrawal of stabilizing visual information is delayed by a concurrent cognitive task.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Velocity dependence of vestibular information for postural control on tilting surfaces.

Authors:  Fay B Horak; JoAnn Kluzik; Frantisek Hlavacka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Principles of vestibular physical therapy rehabilitation.

Authors:  Susan L Whitney; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.138

8.  Human standing posture control system depending on adopted strategies.

Authors:  N Fujisawa; T Masuda; Y Inaoka; H Fukuoka; A Ishida; H Minamitani
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Sensory reweighting as a method of balance training for labyrinthine loss.

Authors:  F J Haran; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Postural mechanisms in moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Adam Goodworth; Sandra Saavedra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.