Literature DB >> 12170246

Long-term outcome of 160 adult patients with natural rubber latex allergy.

Kristiina Turjanmaa1, Mikko Kanto, Hannu Kautiainen, Timo Reunala, Timo Palosuo.   

Abstract

Allergy to natural rubber latex is a major occupational problem in the health care sector and a problem even in other occupations in which protective gloves are used. There is little information available about the long-term outcome at work in large patient populations. To study the occupational outcome when all gloves in the working environment were changed either to low-allergen latex or non-latex gloves, in 1995 to 1996 we re-examined 160 of 174 adult subjects who were diagnosed with natural rubber latex allergy between 1982 and 1994 after a median of 3 years (range, 0.5 to 24 years) after the diagnosis. The outcome in daily work or as a patient in health care was investigated with the use of a questionnaire. Special attention was paid to the assessment of the occurrence of hand eczema. Glove selection policy as an intervention in the treatment of natural rubber latex allergy is described. Of 71 health care workers and 89 non-health care workers, 72% and 83% were atopic; 54% and 65% had hand eczema at the time of diagnosis, and 89% and 19% had work-related allergy to natural rubber latex, respectively. On re-examination, none of the health care workers had changed work because of natural rubber latex allergy, and only 38% had hand eczema (significant decrease). Ninety-eight percent of the non-health care workers, of which 58% had hand eczema, continued with their previous jobs. The use of low-allergen latex or non-latex gloves throughout the health care sector seems to be an adequate step for health care workers who have natural rubber latex allergy; nonhealth care workers get along with personal avoidance of latex gloves if they are not working directly with natural rubber latexcontaining materials in production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12170246     DOI: 10.1067/mai.2002.125332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  5 in total

1.  The German experience 10 years after the latex allergy epidemic: need for further preventive measures in healthcare employees with latex allergy.

Authors:  Rolf Merget; V van Kampen; K Sucker; E Heinze; D Taeger; N Goldscheid; M G Haufs; M Raulf-Heimsoth; K Kromark; A Nienhaus; T Bruening
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Effectiveness of a nationwide interdisciplinary preventive programme for latex allergy.

Authors:  Ute Latza; Frank Haamann; Xaver Baur
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Occupational hazards to dental staff.

Authors:  Jamshid Ayatollahi; Fatemah Ayatollahi; Ali Mellat Ardekani; Rezvan Bahrololoomi; Jahangir Ayatollahi; Ali Ayatollahi; Mohammad Bagher Owlia
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-01

4.  Opportunities and obstacles in translating evidence to policy in occupational asthma.

Authors:  Susan M Tarlo; Ahmed A Arif; George L Delclos; Paul Henneberger; Jenil Patel
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Outcome of occupational latex allergy--work ability and quality of life.

Authors:  Albert Nienhaus; Kathrin Kromark; Monika Raulf-Heimsoth; Vera van Kampen; Rolf Merget
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.