Literature DB >> 12170086

Hormone receptor immunohistochemistry and human papillomavirus in situ hybridization are useful for distinguishing endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Annette Staebler1, Mark E Sherman, Richard J Zaino, Brigitte M Ronnett.   

Abstract

Determining the origin of uterine adenocarcinomas can be difficult in biopsy and curettage specimens because the morphologic spectrum of endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas overlaps. In addition, in hysterectomy specimens the primary site is often equivocal for tumors that involve predominantly the lower uterine segment and endocervix and lack identifiable precursor lesions. We assessed the value of immunohistochemistry for estrogen and progesterone receptors and in situ hybridization for human papillomavirus DNA detection in making this clinically relevant distinction. We evaluated a set of 48 adenocarcinomas of unequivocal origin (24 endocervical carcinomas and 24 endometrial endometrioid carcinomas without cervical extension) and then tested seven lower uterine segment/endocervical carcinomas of equivocal origin to determine whether patterns established in the initial set would permit definitive assignment of primary site for the equivocal set. Only one (4.2%) of 24 endocervical carcinomas was positive for both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, whereas 18 (75%) of 24 endometrial carcinomas were positive for estrogen receptor and 23 (95.8%) of 24 endometrial carcinomas were positive for progesterone receptor (p <0.001, chi2 test). Human papillomavirus DNA was detected in 16 (66.7%) of 24 endocervical carcinomas and in none of 24 endometrial carcinomas (p <0.001, chi2 test). Of the seven tumors of equivocal origin, five could be definitively classified as either endocervical or endometrial in origin based on their demonstration of a characteristic profile with these assays (either estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative/human papillomavirus-positive, consistent with endocervical origin or estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive/human papillomavirus-negative, consistent with endometrial origin). We conclude that hormone receptor immunohistochemistry and human papillomavirus in situ hybridization are useful for distinguishing endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas. The clinical utility of these techniques should be evaluated in studies that include curettage and biopsy specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12170086     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200208000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  15 in total

1.  A panel of 3 markers including p16, ProExC, or HPV ISH is optimal for distinguishing between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Christina S Kong; Andrew H Beck; Teri A Longacre
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  [Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma].

Authors:  T Löning; L Riethdorf; M Köbel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Diagnostic Algorithmic Proposal Based on Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Evaluation of 297 Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Iulia Barsan; Lien Hoang; Prusha Patel; Luis Chiriboga; Cristina Terinte; Anna Pesci; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Takako Kiyokawa; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Malcolm C Pike; Esther Oliva; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 4.  Differentiating rectal carcinoma by an immunohistological analysis of carcinomas of pelvic organs based on the NCBI Literature Survey and the Human Protein Atlas database.

Authors:  Koh Miura; Kazuyuki Ishida; Wataru Fujibuchi; Akihiro Ito; Hitoshi Niikura; Hitoshi Ogawa; Iwao Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Limited utility of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the primary site of disease in patients with inconclusive endometrial biopsy.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Michael R Milam; Michael Deavers; Ricardo dos Reis; Revathy B Iyer; Priya Bhosale; Kathleen M Schmeler
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 6.  Endocervical adenocarcinoma: selected diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  Brigitte M Ronnett
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Association between human papillomavirus and endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nimet Karadayi; Melin Gecer; Sibel Kayahan; Elif Yamuc; Nilufer Kandemir Onak; Taner Korkmaz; Dilek Yavuzer
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Adenocarcinoma of the cervix: should we treat it differently?

Authors:  Ned L Williams; Theresa L Werner; Elke A Jarboe; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Application of Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Diagnostics to Clinically Relevant Problems in Endometrial Cancer Bojana Djordjevic, Shannon Westin, Russell R. Broaddus.

Authors:  Bojana Djordjevic; Shannon Westin; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2012-12-01

10.  Detection of high-risk human papillomavirus subtypes in cervical glandular neoplasia by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Zhang Sheng; Hiroshi Minato; Toshiyuki Sasagawa; Satoko Nakada; Eriko Kinoshita; Nozomu Kurose; Takayuki Nojima; Satoru Makinoda
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.