BACKGROUND: Extension of sensory blockade after an epidural top-up in combined spinal epidural (CSE) anesthesia is partly attributed to compression of the dural sac by the injected volume. This study investigated whether a volume effect plays a significant role when administering an epidural top-up after an initial epidural loading dose and assessed the predictive value of different factors with respect to the increase in sensory blockade. METHODS: After an epidural loading dose of 75 mg ropivacaine, 0.75%, 30 patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups. After the maximum level of sensory blockade (MLSB) had been established, patients received either an epidural top-up with 10 ml ropivacaine, 0.75% (group 1, n = 10) or saline (group 2, n = 10), or no epidural top-up (group 3, n = 10). Subsequently, sensory blockade was assessed at 5-min intervals for a further 30 min by a blinded observer. RESULTS: The MLSB increased significantly in the patients receiving an epidural top-up with ropivacaine but not in the patients receiving normal saline. Sensory block extension was inversely related to the number of segments blocked at the time of the epidural top-up, and female gender was associated with a smaller increase in MLSB. CONCLUSIONS: When using epidural ropivacaine, the extension of sensory blockade after administering an epidural top-up is caused by a local anesthetic effect and not by a volume effect. Under the conditions of this study, predictors of the increase in sensory blockade are the presence of ropivacaine in the top-up injectate, the number of segments blocked at the time of epidural top-up, and gender.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Extension of sensory blockade after an epidural top-up in combined spinal epidural (CSE) anesthesia is partly attributed to compression of the dural sac by the injected volume. This study investigated whether a volume effect plays a significant role when administering an epidural top-up after an initial epidural loading dose and assessed the predictive value of different factors with respect to the increase in sensory blockade. METHODS: After an epidural loading dose of 75 mg ropivacaine, 0.75%, 30 patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups. After the maximum level of sensory blockade (MLSB) had been established, patients received either an epidural top-up with 10 ml ropivacaine, 0.75% (group 1, n = 10) or saline (group 2, n = 10), or no epidural top-up (group 3, n = 10). Subsequently, sensory blockade was assessed at 5-min intervals for a further 30 min by a blinded observer. RESULTS: The MLSB increased significantly in the patients receiving an epidural top-up with ropivacaine but not in the patients receiving normal saline. Sensory block extension was inversely related to the number of segments blocked at the time of the epidural top-up, and female gender was associated with a smaller increase in MLSB. CONCLUSIONS: When using epidural ropivacaine, the extension of sensory blockade after administering an epidural top-up is caused by a local anesthetic effect and not by a volume effect. Under the conditions of this study, predictors of the increase in sensory blockade are the presence of ropivacaine in the top-up injectate, the number of segments blocked at the time of epidural top-up, and gender.