Literature DB >> 12170040

Effect of parecoxib, a novel intravenous cyclooxygenase type-2 inhibitor, on the postoperative opioid requirement and quality of pain control.

Jun Tang1, Shitong Li, Paul F White, Xiaoguang Chen, Ronald H Wender, Raymond Quon, Alexander Sloninsky, Robert Naruse, Robert Kariger, Tom Webb, Eve Norel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The analgesic efficacy and side effect profile of intravenous parecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase type-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, was assessed in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study involving patients undergoing major gynecologic surgical procedures.
METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, 60 consenting women, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, undergoing lower abdominal surgery with a standardized general anesthetic technique were randomly assigned to receive one of three study medications: group 1 (control) received normal saline; group 2 received intravenous parecoxib, 20 mg; and group 3 received intravenous parecoxib, 40 mg. The initial dose of study medication was administered when the patient first requested pain medication after surgery. All patients had access to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine, 1 or 2 mg, with a 6-min lockout period. Subsequent doses of the same study medication were administered at 12-h and 24-h intervals after the initial dose. The postoperative opioid analgesic requirement (PCA morphine usage), pain scores, pain relief scores, side effects, and need for supplemental medications (e.g., antiemetics, antipruritics, laxatives) were recorded.
RESULTS: Compared with saline, intravenous parecoxib, 20 mg and 40 mg every 12 h, significantly decreased the PCA morphine usage during the first 6 h postoperatively (group 1, 25 +/- 13 mg; group 2, 16 +/- 11 mg; group 3, 17 +/- 10 mg) and at 12 h (group 1, 34 +/- 18 mg; group 2, 24 +/- 14 mg; group 3, 23 +/- 13 mg) and 24 h (group 1, 51 +/- 27 mg; group 2, 34 +/- 20 mg; group 3, 33 +/- 21 mg) after surgery. However, there were no significant differences in the patients' global evaluation of the study medications at 12 h and 24 h between those who received intravenous parecoxib (20 or 40 mg) and saline. Moreover, the postoperative pain scores and side effect profiles were similar in the three treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: Intravenous parecoxib (20 or 40 mg) was effective in decreasing the PCA opioid requirement after lower abdominal surgical procedures. However, it failed to improve pain management or reduce opioid-related side effects in the early postoperative period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12170040     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200206000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Non-opioid analgesics for perioperative pain therapy. Risks and rational basis for use].

Authors:  A Brack; H L Rittner; M Schäfer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Comparison of the analgesic effects of cryoanalgesia vs. parecoxib for lung cancer patients after lobectomy.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Ba; Xiao-Dong Li; Xiaofei Zhang; Zhong-Hua Ning; Hanze Zhang; Yi-Ning Liu; Shan-Hong He; Yu Zhu; Chang-Sheng Li; Quan-Hui Wang; Yin Li
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  A risk stratification algorithm using non-invasive respiratory volume monitoring to improve safety when using post-operative opioids in the PACU.

Authors:  Christopher Voscopoulos; Kimberly Theos; H A Tillmann Hein; Edward George
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Perioperative pain management.

Authors:  Srinivas Pyati; Tong J Gan
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Parecoxib sodium in the treatment of postoperative pain after Lichtenstein tension-free mesh inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A V Kyriakidis; I Perysinakis; I Alexandris; K Athanasiou; Ch Papadopoulos; I Mpesikos
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Comparing etoricoxib and celecoxib for preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tanarat Boonriong; Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich; Prapakorn Glabglay; Sasikaan Nimmaanrat
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Parecoxib versus dipyrone (metamizole) for postoperative pain relief after hysterectomy : a prospective, single-centre, randomized, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Stefan Soltesz; Mark U Gerbershagen; Bernhard Pantke; Frank Eichler; Gerd Molter
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  The influence of timing of administration on the analgesic efficacy of parecoxib in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Valéria Martinez; Anissa Belbachir; Aithem Jaber; Kamel Cherif; Adel Jamal; Yves Ozier; Daniel I Sessler; Marcel Chauvin; Dominique Fletcher
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy of Nonopioid Analgesics on Pain following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery.

Authors:  Susanne Abdulla; Regina Eckhardt; Ute Netter; Walied Abdulla
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2012-11-05

Review 10.  Intravenous or intramuscular parecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults.

Authors:  Rosalind Lloyd; Sheena Derry; R Andrew Moore; Henry J McQuay
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.