Literature DB >> 12169265

Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game.

Helen L Gallagher1, Anthony I Jack, Andreas Roepstorff, Christopher D Frith.   

Abstract

The "intentional stance" is the disposition to treat an entity as a rational agent, possessing particular beliefs, desires, and intentions, in order to interpret and predict it's behavior. The intentional stance is a component of a broader social cognitive function, mentalizing. Here we report a study that investigates the neural substrates of "on-line" mentalizing, using PET, by asking volunteers to second-guess an opponent. In order to identify brain activity specifically associated with adoption of an intentional stance, we used a paradigm that allowed tight control of other cognitive demands. Volunteers played a computerised version of the children's game "stone, paper, scissors." In the mentalizing condition volunteers believed they were playing against the experimenter. In the comparison condition, volunteers believed they were playing against a computer. In fact, during the actual scanning, the "opponent" produced a random sequence in both conditions. The only difference was the attitude, or stance, adopted by the volunteer. Only one region was more active when volunteers adopted the intentional stance. This was in anterior paracingulate cortex (bilaterally). This region has been activated in a number of previous studies involving mentalizing. However, this is the first study suggesting a specific link between activity in this brain region and the adoption of an intentional stance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12169265     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  122 in total

1.  Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing.

Authors:  Uta Frith; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Neural correlates of anchoring-and-adjustment during mentalizing.

Authors:  Diana I Tamir; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  What's at the top in the top-down control of action? Script-sharing and 'top-top' control of action in cognitive experiments.

Authors:  Andreas Roepstorff; Chris Frith
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-02-05

4.  Neural correlates of bridging inferences and coherence processing.

Authors:  Sung-il Kim; Misun Yoon; Wonsik Kim; Sunyoung Lee; Eunjoo Kang
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-08

5.  Can we share the joy of others? Empathic neural responses to distress vs joy.

Authors:  Daniella Perry; Talma Hendler; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Interactive brains, social minds.

Authors:  Johanna Sänger; Ulman Lindenberger; Viktor Müller
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

7.  Does context matter in evaluations of stigmatized individuals? An fMRI study.

Authors:  Anne C Krendl; Joseph M Moran; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Neural basis of conditional cooperation.

Authors:  Shinsuke Suzuki; Kazuhisa Niki; Syoken Fujisaki; Eizo Akiyama
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Redcay; Leonhard Schilbach
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Neural correlates of developing theory of mind competence in early childhood.

Authors:  Yaqiong Xiao; Fengji Geng; Tracy Riggins; Gang Chen; Elizabeth Redcay
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.