Literature DB >> 12167794

European experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis.

Walter Benno Eichinger1, Florian Botzenhardt, Ralf Gunzinger, Bernhard M Kemkes, Andrzej Sosnowski, Dominique Maïza, Eduardo Otero Coto, Niels Bleese.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Mosaic bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn).
METHODS: The stented porcine bioprosthesis combines the amino-oleic acid antimineralization treatment and the zero-pressure differential fixation technique for improved tissue durability. From February 1994 to May 1999, a total of 561 patients underwent valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis at 5 centers in Europe: 461 in the aortic and 100 in the mitral position. There were 261 women and 300 men; mean age at implantation was 70 years (range, 23-89 years). Mean follow-up was 2.9 years (range, 0-6.2 years), with a total follow-up of 1710.1 patient-years.
RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 4.2% per patient-year, including a valve-related mortality of 0.4% per patient-year. The freedom from event rates in the aortic position at 5 years and in the mitral position at 4 years were, respectively, 96.6% +/- 1.1% and 94.9% +/- 3.3% for primary thromboembolism, 96.4% +/- 5.0% and 87.1% +/- 4.8% for antithromboembolic-related hemorrhage, 99.1% +/- 0.5% and 100% for thrombosed prosthesis, 98.8% +/- 1.2% and 100% for structural valve deterioration, 98.8% +/- 0.7% and 100% for nonstructural dysfunction, 98.4% +/- 0.6% and 94.4% +/- 3.8% for endocarditis, and 95.4% +/- 1.6% and 95.3% +/- 3.7% for explant and reoperation. Mean pressure gradient values at 5 years ranged from 7.5 to 15.9 mm Hg in the aortic position and at 4 years from 2.0 to 6.9 mm Hg in the mitral position across all valve sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Mosaic bioprosthesis were very satisfactory during the first 6 years after clinical introduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12167794     DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2002.122552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

1.  Mitral bioprosthetic valve stenosis in a patient with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Akimasa Morisaki; Hidekazu Hirai; Yasuyuki Sasaki; Mitsuharu Hosono; Masanori Sakaguchi; Atsushi Nakahira; Hiroyuki Seo; Shigefumi Suehiro
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-17

2.  The Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthesis: A Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Follow-Up.

Authors:  Michele Celiento; Stefania Blasi; Andrea De Martino; Stefano Pratali; Aldo D Milano; Uberto Bortolotti
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2016-02-01

3.  Computational investigation of left ventricular hemodynamics following bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Emily L Johnson; Chenglong Wang; Arian Jafari; Cheng-Hau Yang; Michael S Sacks; Adarsh Krishnamurthy; Ming-Chen Hsu
Journal:  Mech Res Commun       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.254

4.  Antithrombotic Strategies After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Joel N Papak; Joseph C Chiovaro; North Noelck; Laura D Healy; Michele Freeman; Jacquelyn A Quin; Robin Paynter; Allison Low; Karli Kondo; Owen J T McCarty; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Late results after mitral valve replacement with Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger.

Authors:  Giovanni A Chiariello; Anne-Sophie Beraud; Olivier Vahdat; Jérôme Van Rothem; Olivier Garcia; Philippe Soula; Pierre Berthoumieu; Issam Abouliatim
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.