Literature DB >> 12167577

Multivariate prognostic model for patients with thick cutaneous melanoma: importance of sentinel lymph node status.

Cristina R Ferrone1, Katherine S Panageas, Klaus Busam, Mary Sue Brady, Daniel G Coit.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The overall prognosis of patients with thick cutaneous melanoma (TCM) is generally thought to be poor. Surgically staging these patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy remains controversial. This study was performed to determine whether SLN status improved our ability to predict outcome over other known prognostic factors and to develop a model incorporating independent prognostic factors to estimate the risk of recurrence for an individual patient.
METHODS: A prospective database identified patients with TCM (>4.0 mm or Clark level V) and clinically negative nodes who underwent SLN biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
RESULTS: From 1991 to 2001, 126 patients were identified; 75 (60%) were male. The median age was 60 years. The median tumor thickness was 5.5 mm, and 43% were ulcerated. Thirty percent of patients had a positive SLN. Recurrence was seen in 50 patients (40%). Median follow-up, relapse-free survival, and overall survival were 25, 50, and 68 months, respectively. Factors independently predictive of recurrence were age >/=60 years, depth >5.5 mm, ulceration, and SLN positivity. SLN status was the most significant prognostic factor (P <.001). The relative risk of recurrence for an individual patient ranged from 1 in patients for whom no adverse factors were present to 29.4 when all factors were present.
CONCLUSIONS: SLN status was the strongest independent predictor of outcome in patients with TCM. However, patients with TCM are prognostically heterogeneous, and all independently predictive factors should be considered when an individual patient's risk of recurrence is assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12167577     DOI: 10.1007/bf02574479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  22 in total

1.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma: results of 10 years' experience in two regional training hospitals in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Frank J van den Broek; Pim C Sloots; Jan-Willem D de Waard; Rudi M Roumen
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Sandra L Wong; Charles M Balch; Patricia Hurley; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Timothy J Akhurst; Alistair Cochran; Janice N Cormier; Mark Gorman; Theodore Y Kim; Kelly M McMasters; R Dirk Noyes; Lynn M Schuchter; Matias E Valsecchi; Donald L Weaver; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Is Prognostic in Thickest Melanoma Cases and Should Be Performed for Thick Melanomas.

Authors:  Dale Han; Gang Han; Monica T Duque; Steven Morrison; Stanley P Leong; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; John Vetto; Richard White; Schlomo Schneebaum; Barbara Pockaj; Nicola Mozzillo; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  [Sentinel node biopsy. What are the facts?].

Authors:  M Möhrle; H Breuninger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Sentinel lymph node status as most important prognostic factor in patients with high-risk cutaneous melanomas (tumour thickness >4.00 mm): outcome analysis from a single institution.

Authors:  Torsten Hinz; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Anja Wierzbicki; Tobias Hoeller; Joerg Wenzel; Hans-J Biersack; Thomas Bieber; Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Clinical utilities and biological characteristics of melanoma sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Dale Han; Daniel C Thomas; Jonathan S Zager; Barbara Pockaj; Richard L White; Stanley Pl Leong
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-10

7.  Age as a prognostic factor in patients with localized melanoma and regional metastases.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Seng-jaw Soong; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; John F Thompson; Daniel G Coit; Michael B Atkins; Shouluan Ding; Alistair J Cochran; Alexander M M Eggermont; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; Timothy M Johnson; John M Kirkwood; Stanley P Leong; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Melanoma sentinel node biopsy and prediction models for relapse and overall survival.

Authors:  A Mitra; C Conway; C Walker; M Cook; B Powell; S Lobo; M Chan; M Kissin; G Layer; J Smallwood; C Ottensmeier; P Stanley; H Peach; H Chong; F Elliott; M M Iles; J Nsengimana; J H Barrett; D T Bishop; J A Newton-Bishop
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Thick melanoma: prognostic value of positive sentinel nodes.

Authors:  Lenka Vermeeren; Fred W C van der Ent; Prapto S H Sastrowijoto; Karel W E Hulsewé
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Seng-Jaw Soong; John F Thompson; Michael B Atkins; David R Byrd; Antonio C Buzaid; Alistair J Cochran; Daniel G Coit; Shouluan Ding; Alexander M Eggermont; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; John M Kirkwood; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Arthur J Sober; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.