Literature DB >> 12167257

The influence of working-memory demand and subject performance on prefrontal cortical activity.

Bart Rypma1, Jeffrey S Berger, Mark D'Esposito.   

Abstract

Brain imaging and behavioral studies of working memory (WM) converge to suggest that the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) mediates a capacity-limited storage buffer and that the dorsolateral PFC mediates memory organization processes that support supracapacity memory storage. Previous research from our laboratory has shown that the extent to which such memory organization processes are required depends on both task factors (i.e., memory load) and subject factors (i.e., response speed). Task factors exert their effects mainly during WM encoding while subject factors exert their effects mainly during WM retrieval. In this study, we sought to test the generalizability of these phenomena under more difficult memory-demand conditions than have been used previously. During scanning, subjects performed a WM task in which they were required to maintain between 1 and 8 letters over a brief delay. Neural activity was measured during encoding, maintenance, and retrieval task periods using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. With increasing memory load, there were reaction time increases and accuracy rate decreases, ventrolateral PFC activation decreases during encoding, and dorsolateral PFC activation increases during maintenance and retrieval. These results suggest that the ventrolateral PFC mediates WM storage and that the dorsolateral PFC mediates strategic memory organization processes that facilitate supracapacity WM storage. Additionally, high-performing subjects showed overall less activation than low-performing subjects, but activation increases with increasing memory load in the lateral PFC during maintenance and retrieval. Low-performing subjects showed overall more activation than high-performing subjects, but minimal activation increases in the dorsolateral PFC with increasing memory load. These results suggest that individual differences in both neural efficiency and cognitive strategy underlie individual differences in the quality of subjects' WM performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12167257     DOI: 10.1162/08989290260138627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  114 in total

1.  Negative correlation between right prefrontal activity during response inhibition and impulsiveness: a fMRI study.

Authors:  Shuji Asahi; Yasumasa Okamoto; Go Okada; Shigeto Yamawaki; Norio Yokota
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Causal interactions in attention networks predict behavioral performance.

Authors:  Xiaotong Wen; Li Yao; Yijun Liu; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Using fMRI to investigate a component process of reflection: prefrontal correlates of refreshing a just-activated representation.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Carol L Raye; Karen J Mitchell; Erich J Greene; William A Cunningham; Charles A Sanislow
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Memory maintenance and inhibitory control differentiate from early childhood to adolescence.

Authors:  Yee Lee Shing; Ulman Lindenberger; Adele Diamond; Shu-Chen Li; Matthew C Davidson
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  The effect of memory load on cortical activity in the spatial working memory circuit.

Authors:  Hoi-Chung Leung; David Seelig; John C Gore
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity.

Authors:  J Jay Todd; René Marois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Structural brain variation, age, and response time.

Authors:  Richard J Haier; Rex E Jung; Ronald A Yeo; Kevin Head; Michael T Alkire
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Neuropsychological predictors of BOLD response during a spatial working memory task in adolescents: what can performance tell us about fMRI response patterns?

Authors:  Bonnie J Nagel; Valerie C Barlett; Alecia D Schweinsburg; Susan F Tapert
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.475

Review 9.  Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain.

Authors:  B R Postle
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Central Executive Dysfunction and Deferred Prefrontal Processing in Veterans with Gulf War Illness.

Authors:  Nicholas A Hubbard; Joanna L Hutchison; Michael A Motes; Ehsan Shokri-Kojori; Ilana J Bennett; Ryan M Brigante; Robert W Haley; Bart Rypma
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.