Literature DB >> 12167198

Accuracy and precision of two in-shoe pressure measurement systems.

Hongwei Hsiao1, Jinhua Guan, Matthew Weatherly.   

Abstract

The recent rapid adoption of insole pressure measurement systems for clinical and ergonomic evaluations of human gait has necessitated a comprehensive understanding of the accuracy and precision of such systems. Five bench experiments were performed to examine the Pedar and F-Scan in-shoe pressure measurement systems. The insoles examined were the Pedar Y-sized right insole and the F-scan insole trimmed to the size and shape of a Pedar Y-sized insole. Data were sampled at 50 Hz at different levels of applied pressure, calibration procedure, duration of pressure application, insole age of use and experiment day or week. The system accuracy was determined by the per cent error of measurement, the system precision by the 95% tolerance interval of the per cent error. The results show that system accuracy and precision varied among levels of applied pressure, calibration procedure, duration of pressure application and insole age of use. The Pedar system showed the greatest accuracy and precision when the insole was new and measurements were taken (1) after a system calibration as specified by the manufacturer, (2) in the 50 - 500 kPa pressure range and (3) within a few seconds after pressure was applied. Under this condition, the measurement error was in the range -0.6 to 2.7%, and the magnitude (upper bound minus lower bound) of the 95% tolerance intervals was from 13.5 to 18.7%. Measuring less than 35 kPa with the Pedar system is not recommended. To ensure the accuracy and precision of the F-Scan system, users are recommended to estimate the range of the applied pressure and then choose a similar pressure level for calibration. Under this condition, the measurement error was in the range 1.3 - 5.8% and the magnitude (upper bound minus lower bound) of the 95% tolerance intervals was estimated to be in the range 1.1 - 14.8%. When the calibration pressure was outside this range of applied pressure, the per cent errors were considerably higher, ranging from -26.3 to 33.9%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12167198     DOI: 10.1080/00140130210136963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  25 in total

1.  Surface electromyography and plantar pressure during walking in young adults with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Rachel M Koldenhoven; Mark A Feger; John J Fraser; Susan Saliba; Jay Hertel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Spatial synchronization of an insole pressure distribution system with a 3D motion analysis system for center of pressure measurements.

Authors:  Laetitia Fradet; Johannes Siegel; Marieke Dahl; Merkur Alimusaj; Sebastian I Wolf
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Weight-Bearing Exercise and Foot Health in Native Americans.

Authors:  Elena Cuaderes; Lise DeShea; W Lyndon Lamb
Journal:  Care Manag J       Date:  2014-12

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of reconstruction plates with locking, nonlocking, and hybrid screws configurations in calcaneal fracture: a finite element model study.

Authors:  Ching-Hsuan Chen; Chinghua Hung; Yu-Chun Hsu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chao-Ching Chiang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Plantar pressure distribution patterns during gait in diabetic neuropathy patients with a history of foot ulcers.

Authors:  Tatiana Almeida Bacarin; Isabel C N Sacco; Ewald M Hennig
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Influence of patellofemoral pain syndrome on plantar pressure in the foot rollover process during gait.

Authors:  Sandra Aliberti; Mariana de S X Costa; Anice de Campos Passaro; Antônio Carlos Arnone; Rogério Hirata; Isabel C N Sacco
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months.

Authors:  David Culliford; Ruth Allen; James Beacroft; Lindsey Hooper; Jane Burridge; Christopher J Edwards; Nigel K Arden; Catherine J Bowen; Anita Gay
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Contoured, prefabricated foot orthoses demonstrate comparable mechanical properties to contoured, customised foot orthoses: a plantar pressure study.

Authors:  Anthony C Redmond; Karl B Landorf; Anne-Maree Keenan
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  A comparison of customised and prefabricated insoles to reduce risk factors for neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: a participant-blinded randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Joanne S Paton; Elizabeth A Stenhouse; Graham Bruce; Daniel Zahra; Ray B Jones
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Design and test of a soft plantar force measurement system for gait detection.

Authors:  Xuefeng Zhang; Yulong Zhao; Zhengyong Duan; Yan Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.