Literature DB >> 12167124

What is the impact of coexistence of hepatolithiasis on cholangiocarcinoma?

Cheng-Chi Lee1, Chun-Ying Wu, Gran-Hum Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatolithiasis is a well-known etiology of cholangiocarcinoma. However, whether or not hepatolithiasis influences the presentation of cholangiocarcinoma is not very clear. To help clarify this, we conducted the present study to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of cholangiocarcinoma with hepatolithiasis. As well, we made a comparison between the presence and absence of hepatolithiasis in patients with cholangiocarcinoma to determine the impact of hepatolithiasis.
METHODS: Among 140 patients with histologically proven cholangiocarcinoma at the Taichung Veteran General Hospital between October 1982 and December 2000, 38 were found to have concomitant hepatolithiasis. Patients were evaluated on the basis of age, gender, presenting symptom, laboratory data, preoperative liver function (indocyanine green test), tumor markers, histological differentiation, lymph node involvement, and organ metastasis. Data were statistically analyzed using the chi-squared test and Student's t-test. Analysis of survival was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate analysis and multivariate analyses for survival were performed by Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: The cholangiocarcinoma with hepatolithiasis group (CC + HL) was found to be predominantly female, with more common presentation of fever and less presentation of jaundice (P < 0.05). In addition, patients with cholangiocarcinoma without hepatolithiasis (CC - HL group) had higher serum bilirubin levels and more advanced histological differentiation (P < 0.05). As well, the percentage of resectability of the CC + HL group was higher than that of the CC - HL group, although it was not statistically significant. Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival showed that those patients with an age older than 65 years, hypoalbuminemia, poor histological differentiation, and a presence of hepatolithiasis were prone to a graver prognosis, albeit none of them were statistically significant. Resectability was the only independent predictor of a favorable prognosis with significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinicopathological features of cholangiocarcinoma with concomitant hepatolithiasis showed few differences from that without hepatolithiasis. Resectability was the only predictor that favored a good prognosis. Copyright 2002 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12167124     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02779.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  18 in total

1.  Outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.

Authors:  Tung-Yen Lee; Yao-Li Chen; Hung-Chi Chang; Chien-Pin Chan; Shou-Jen Kuo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Selection of appropriate liver resection in left hepatolithiasis based on anatomic and clinical study.

Authors:  Seung Eun Lee; Jin-Young Jang; Jeong Min Lee; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Bilateral liver resection for bilateral intrahepatic stones.

Authors:  Shao-Qiang Li; Li-Jian Liang; Yun-Peng Hua; Bao-Gang Peng; Dong Chen; Shun-Jun Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Diagnosis and surgical treatment of intrahepatic hepatolithiasis combined with cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Qian D Zhu; Meng T Zhou; Qing Q Zhou; Hong Q Shi; Qi Y Zhang; Zheng P Yu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Xu-Feng Zhang; Jeffery Chakedis; Fabio Bagante; Eliza W Beal; Yi Lv; Matthew Weiss; Irinel Popescu; Hugo P Marques; Luca Aldrighetti; Shishir K Maithel; Carlo Pulitano; Todd W Bauer; Feng Shen; George A Poultsides; Oliver Soubrane; Guillaume Martel; B Groot Koerkamp; Alfredo Guglielmi; Endo Itaru; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Risk Factors for Cholangiocarcinoma After Initial Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Stones.

Authors:  Ze-Wu Meng; Sheng-Hua Han; Jin-Hai Zhu; Liang-Yi Zhou; Yan-Ling Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Incidence and Prognosis of Subsequent Cholangiocarcinoma in Patients with Hepatic Resection for Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Kim; Tae Uk Kang; Heather Swan; Min Ji Kang; Nayoung Kim; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Seon Mee Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors after liver resection.

Authors:  Gennaro Nuzzo; Felice Giuliante; Francesco Ardito; Agostino Maria De Rose; Maria Vellone; Gennaro Clemente; Carlo Chiarla; Ivo Giovannini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2010-08

Review 9.  Hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A review.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Kim; Jae Seon Kim; Moon Kyung Joo; Beom Jae Lee; Ji Hoon Kim; Jong Eun Yeon; Jong-Jae Park; Kwan Soo Byun; Young-Tae Bak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Comparison of concomitant and subsequent cholangiocarcinomas associated with hepatolithiasis: Clinical implications.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Lin; Ping-Yi Lin; Yao-Li Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.