Literature DB >> 12166022

Failure of intensive fetal monitoring and ultrasound in reducing the stillbirth rate.

Alberto de la Vega1, Maribelle Verdiales.   

Abstract

Although highly popularized among obstetricians, there are conflicting results regarding the efficacy of high-resolution ultrasound and other fetal well-being tests on improving neonatal outcome and morbidity. To assess the impact of unrestricted fetal well-being tests and sonographic evaluations on the stillbirth rate, we evaluated a total of 1,810 pregnancies 20 weeks of gestation or more from a single private clinic serving a mixed population of high and low-risk patients. All patients were performed high-resolution sonography during each trimester of pregnancy. In addition, on each prenatal visit, fetal heart rate, position and amniotic fluid index were documented by a limited sonographic scan. Further sonographic studies were done whenever deemed necessary depending on the clinical situation. Biophysical profiles were performed in the third trimester at any time a risk factor was identified, and repeated as frequently as estimated necessary. All cases of fetal death in utero were documented and the associated maternal risk factors assessed. A total of 14 stillbirths occurred among the 1,810 patients. The stillbirth rate for this population was determined to be 7.7/1000 births (U.S. national average of 6.7-7.8/1000 births). The most common associated maternal complications were Diabetes (4 cases) and Antiphospholipid syndrome (3 cases). All except for one fetus lost at 37 weeks had at least one identifiable maternal risk factor. These results prove that intensive fetal surveillance, even when unrestricted by economic concerns, has limited effectiveness in avoiding fetal demise. This is most probably due to acute placental and cord accidents that cannot be detected promptly enough or that are simply unavoidable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12166022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  P R Health Sci J        ISSN: 0738-0658            Impact factor:   0.705


  2 in total

Review 1.  Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour.

Authors:  Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Tanya Soomro; Esme V Menezes; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 2.  Health implications resulting from the timing of elective cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Raed Salim; Eliezer Shalev
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.