Literature DB >> 12165815

Animal experimentation in sciences: sadistic nonsense or indispensable necessity?

Kay Brune1.   

Abstract

The history of biomedical research clearly shows that, with exception of a very few, scientific findings could be realised only with the help of animal experiments. Unfortunately, in the past the life of animals was treated negligently and, at times, in fact criminally. Only the researchers' willingness to apply ethical principles toward laboratory animals could create a climate in which research is opening up to constructive, active animal protection and is ready to co-operate through the implementations of such programmes as the 3R-principle into daily practice. Using a number of examples, the article at hand tries to show that the dimensions concerning animal protection is very old indeed and that only a change of consciousness by the public and in research has created a situation in which a gentler treatment of life and life conditions of laboratory animals could be realised. A further development of "constructive" animal protection within the industrialised nations is only possible with this back ground. Without such a development, biomedical research is bound for deficits in one way or another. It will be loosing it's medical and economical opportunities and with it, it's meaning for man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12165815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  2 in total

1.  Longitudinal trends and subgroup analysis in publication patterns for preclinical data of newly approved drugs.

Authors:  Ursula Köster; Ingo Nolte; Martin C Michel
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 2.  High throughput screening for anti-Trypanosoma cruzi drug discovery.

Authors:  Julio Alonso-Padilla; Ana Rodríguez
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-12-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.