BACKGROUND: Stereologic methods have emerged as the technique of choice in assessing glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness, following conceptual modeling comparing the stereologic technique of harmonic mean of the orthogonal intercept estimation (Th) with the model based method of arithmetic mean estimation (ATH), with no direct comparison undertaken. We undertook to establish the gold standard for GBM estimation and use this technique to establish a range for GBM thickness in children. METHODS: Intra-observer and inter-glomerular variation was estimated in 34 cases with (presumed) normal GBM thickness, using Th, ATH and a rapid direct measurement technique, with intra-observer variation measured in 35 cases with GBM attenuation. A total of 34,011 measurements were undertaken to establish a range for Th in children on 212 biopsies from 199 patients (127 male) demonstrating minimal change nephropathy (N = 153), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (24), no abnormality (24), and acute tubular necrosis (8), which were used as surrogates for normals. RESULTS: Th demonstrated less variation than ATH in both the normal and attenuated groups. GBM thickness increased throughout childhood, from 194 +/- 6.5 nm (mean +/- SE) at one year to 297 +/- 6.0 nm at 11 years, with a reduced rate of increase after age 11 years. CONCLUSION: Stereologic methods are superior to model based techniques in estimating GBM thickness and should be regarded as the technique of choice in this area. GBM thickness was observed to increase during childhood with no gender effect demonstrable as a main effect or interaction.
BACKGROUND: Stereologic methods have emerged as the technique of choice in assessing glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness, following conceptual modeling comparing the stereologic technique of harmonic mean of the orthogonal intercept estimation (Th) with the model based method of arithmetic mean estimation (ATH), with no direct comparison undertaken. We undertook to establish the gold standard for GBM estimation and use this technique to establish a range for GBM thickness in children. METHODS: Intra-observer and inter-glomerular variation was estimated in 34 cases with (presumed) normal GBM thickness, using Th, ATH and a rapid direct measurement technique, with intra-observer variation measured in 35 cases with GBM attenuation. A total of 34,011 measurements were undertaken to establish a range for Th in children on 212 biopsies from 199 patients (127 male) demonstrating minimal change nephropathy (N = 153), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (24), no abnormality (24), and acute tubular necrosis (8), which were used as surrogates for normals. RESULTS: Th demonstrated less variation than ATH in both the normal and attenuated groups. GBM thickness increased throughout childhood, from 194 +/- 6.5 nm (mean +/- SE) at one year to 297 +/- 6.0 nm at 11 years, with a reduced rate of increase after age 11 years. CONCLUSION: Stereologic methods are superior to model based techniques in estimating GBM thickness and should be regarded as the technique of choice in this area. GBM thickness was observed to increase during childhood with no gender effect demonstrable as a main effect or interaction.
Authors: Liming Wang; Yonggang Sha; Jingyi Bai; William Eisner; Matthew A Sparks; Anne F Buckley; Robert F Spurney Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2017-05-10
Authors: Hongyu Zhang; Viji Nair; Jharna Saha; Kevin B Atkins; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Thomas L Saunders; Martin G Myers; Thomas Werner; Matthias Kretzler; Frank C Brosius Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Brian P Danysh; Kirk J Czymmek; Pecos T Olurin; Jacob G Sivak; Melinda K Duncan Journal: Anat Rec (Hoboken) Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.064
Authors: Yukiko Kanetsuna; Keiko Takahashi; Michio Nagata; Maureen A Gannon; Matthew D Breyer; Raymond C Harris; Takamune Takahashi Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Laura A Maile; Walker H Busby; Katherine A Gollahon; William Flowers; Nikol Garbacik; Stefani Garbacik; Kara Stewart; Timothy Nichols; Dwight Bellinger; Amit Patel; Paul Dunbar; Matt Medlin; David Clemmons Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Jae-Hyung Chang; Seung-Yeol Paik; Lan Mao; William Eisner; Patrick J Flannery; Liming Wang; Yuping Tang; Natalie Mattocks; Samy Hadjadj; Jean-Michel Goujon; Phillip Ruiz; Susan B Gurley; Robert F Spurney Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 3.240