Literature DB >> 12164291

Field evaluation of the ICT Malaria Pf/Pv immunochromatographic test for the detection of asymptomatic malaria in a Plasmodium falciparum/vivax endemic area in Thailand.

Russell E Coleman1, Nongnuj Maneechai, Nattawan Rachapaew, Chalermpol Kumpitak, Virat Soyseng, Robert S Miller, Krongthong Thimasarn, Jetsumon Sattabongkot.   

Abstract

Rapid antigen assays provide an effective tool for the detection of malaria in symptomatic patients. However, the efficacy of these devices for detecting asymptomatic malaria, where parasite levels are normally significantly lower than in symptomatic patients, is less well established. We evaluated the efficacy of a new combined Plasmodium falciparum-Plasmodim vivax immunochromatographic test (ICT Malaria Pf/Pv) in a cross-sectional malaria survey of the village of Ban Kong Mong Tha, Kanchanaburi Provice, Thailand, from August to December 2000. A total of 1,976 bleeds were made from 559 individuals over the course of the study. Blinded microscopy of thick and thin blood films was used as the gold standard; all discordant and 10% of concordant results were cross-checked. Of 1,976 ICT Malaria Pf/Pv dipsticks tested, 98.3% (n = 1,943) performed as expected, as evidenced by the appearance of the control line. The ICT Malaria Pf/Pv test was both sensitive (100.0%) and specific (99.7 %) for the diagnosis of falciparum malaria with parasitemias of > or = 500 trophozoites/microL; however, only 15.9% (13/82) of infected individuals had parasitemia rates this high. When P. falciparum parasitemia rates were < 500/microL, the sensitivity of the diagnosis was only 23.3%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 76.2 and 97.2%, respectively. The ICT Malaria Pf/Pv test was specific, but not sensitive, for the diagnosis of vivax malaria with parasite rates of > or = 500 trophozoites/microl, with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 66.7%, 99.9%, 66.7%, and 99.9%, respectively. At parasite rates of < 500/microL, corresponding values were 0.0%, 99.9%, 0%, and 95.1%. Because of the relatively high cost of these assays, low parasite rates found in the majority of asymptomatic individuals, and low sensitivity of this assay with rates of < 500/microl, use of this assay as a tool for active case detection is of limited value in western Thailand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12164291     DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  22 in total

1.  Fever and shock in a child: How 'good' is a good blood test?

Authors:  Nevin Kollannoor Chinnan; Pragnyadipta Mishra
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Malaria in selected non-Amazonian countries of Latin America.

Authors:  Myriam Arevalo-Herrera; Martha Lucia Quiñones; Carlos Guerra; Nora Céspedes; Sandra Giron; Martha Ahumada; Juan Gabriel Piñeros; Norma Padilla; Zilka Terrientes; Angel Rosas; Julio Cesar Padilla; Ananias A Escalante; John C Beier; Socrates Herrera
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.112

3.  Prospects for malaria elimination in non-Amazonian regions of Latin America.

Authors:  Sócrates Herrera; Martha Lucia Quiñones; Juan Pablo Quintero; Vladimir Corredor; Douglas O Fuller; Julio Cesar Mateus; Jose E Calzada; Juan B Gutierrez; Alejandro Llanos; Edison Soto; Clara Menendez; Yimin Wu; Pedro Alonso; Gabriel Carrasquilla; Mary Galinski; John C Beier; Myriam Arévalo-Herrera
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.112

4.  Use of HRP-2-based rapid diagnostic test for Plasmodium falciparum malaria: assessing accuracy and cost-effectiveness in the villages of Dielmo and Ndiop, Senegal.

Authors:  Alioune Badara Ly; Adama Tall; Robert Perry; Laurence Baril; Abdoulaye Badiane; Joseph Faye; Christophe Rogier; Aissatou Touré; Cheikh Sokhna; Jean-François Trape; Rémy Michel
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Diagnosis of vivax malaria using an IgM capture ELISA is a sensitive method, even for low levels of parasitemia.

Authors:  Jae-Won Park; Seung Bum Yoo; Jae Hoon Oh; Joon-Sup Yeom; Young-Ha Lee; Young Yil Bahk; Yu Sam Kim; Kook Jin Lim
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Humoral responses against the C-terminal region of merozoite surface protein 1 can be remembered for more than 30 years in persons exposed to Plasmodium vivax.

Authors:  Kook Jin Lim; Jea Won Park; Joon-Sup Yeom; Young-Ha Lee; Seung Bum Yoo; Jae Hoon Oh; Mi Jin Sohn; Young Yil Bahk; Yu Sam Kim
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 7.  Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in endemic countries.

Authors:  Katharine Abba; Jonathan J Deeks; Piero Olliaro; Cho-Min Naing; Sally M Jackson; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sarah Donegan; Paul Garner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

Review 8.  Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated non-falciparum or Plasmodium vivax malaria in endemic countries.

Authors:  Katharine Abba; Amanda J Kirkham; Piero L Olliaro; Jonathan J Deeks; Sarah Donegan; Paul Garner; Yemisi Takwoingi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-18

9.  Test characteristics of the SD FK80 Plasmodium falciparum/Plasmodium vivax malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting.

Authors:  Philippe Gillet; David P J van Dijk; Emmanuel Bottieau; Lieselotte Cnops; Marjan Van Esbroeck; Jan Jacobs
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Evaluation of the SD FK70 malaria Ag Plasmodium vivax rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting.

Authors:  Philippe Gillet; Katrien Bosselaers; Lieselotte Cnops; Emmanuel Bottieau; Marjan Van Esbroeck; Jan Jacobs
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.