Literature DB >> 12163796

Beneficial effect of a prone position for patients with hypoxemia after transthoracic esophagectomy.

Ippei Watanabe1, Hideyoshi Fujihara, Kazunori Sato, Tadayuki Honda, Satomi Ohashi, Hiroshi Endoh, Tomohiro Yamakura, Kiichiro Taga, Koki Shimoji.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the prone position has been reported to improve arterial oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, there have been no reports on its efficacy in patients with hypoxemia after transthoracic esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of the prone position on hypoxemia after three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical study.
SETTING: General intensive care unit at a university hospital. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Sixteen patients who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy and showed hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ratios of <200 under positive end-expiratory pressure of >5 cm H2O) on the fifth postoperative day were randomly assigned to prone (eight patients) and nonprone (eight patients) groups. Prone position for 6 hrs was carried out for four consecutive days. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio, the duration of ventilatory support, and length of stay, were measured.
RESULTS: Oxygenation: The PaO2/FiO2 ratio markedly increased by 32% +/- 22% in seven of eight patients (p <.05) when the patients were moved from the supine to the prone position. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio after the fourth prone position (238 +/- 55, p <.05) was significantly higher than that before the first trial of prone position (166 +/- 25) in these seven patients. Duration of ventilatory support and intensive care unit length of stay: Both the ventilation period (11.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 14.0 +/- 1.6 days, p =.0029) and the length of stay in the intensive care unit (12.8 +/- 4.4 vs. 17.2 +/- 3.4 days, p =.0032) were significantly shorter in the prone group compared with the nonprone group. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio at the time of cessation of prone positioning was significantly higher than the corresponding value in the nonprone group.
CONCLUSION: In hypoxemic patients after three-field lymphadenectomy, the prone position improved arterial oxygenation without any deleterious effects. The beneficial effect of the prone position is possibly attributable to opening of the bronchi obstructed by secretions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163796     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200208000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  14 in total

Review 1.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Effect of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Sud; Maneesh Sud; Jan O Friedrich; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The efficacy and safety of prone positioning in adults patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  So Young Park; Hyun Jung Kim; Kwan Ha Yoo; Yong Bum Park; Seo Woo Kim; Seok Jeong Lee; Eun Kyung Kim; Jung Hyun Kim; Yee Hyung Kim; Ji-Yong Moon; Kyung Hoon Min; Sung Soo Park; Jinwoo Lee; Chang-Hoon Lee; Jinkyeong Park; Min Kwang Byun; Sei Won Lee; ChinKook Rlee; Ji Ye Jung; Yun Su Sim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Prone position in thoracoscopic esophagectomy improves postoperative oxygenation and reduces pulmonary complications.

Authors:  Dai Otsubo; Tetsu Nakamura; Masashi Yamamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Kiyonori Kanemitsu; Kimihiro Yamashita; Tatsuya Imanishi; Taro Oshikiri; Yasuo Sumi; Satoshi Suzuki; Daisuke Kuroda; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilation on mortality among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Sud; Jan O Friedrich; Neill K J Adhikari; Paolo Taccone; Jordi Mancebo; Federico Polli; Roberto Latini; Antonio Pesenti; Martha A Q Curley; Rafael Fernandez; Ming-Cheng Chan; Pascal Beuret; Gregor Voggenreiter; Maneesh Sud; Gianni Tognoni; Luciano Gattinoni; Claude Guérin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kazuo Koyanagi; Soji Ozawa; Yuji Tachimori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Sud; Jan O Friedrich; Paolo Taccone; Federico Polli; Neill K J Adhikari; Roberto Latini; Antonio Pesenti; Claude Guérin; Jordi Mancebo; Martha A Q Curley; Rafael Fernandez; Ming-Cheng Chan; Pascal Beuret; Gregor Voggenreiter; Maneesh Sud; Gianni Tognoni; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Prone positioning reduces mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome in the low tidal volume era: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy R Beitler; Shahzad Shaefi; Sydney B Montesi; Amy Devlin; Stephen H Loring; Daniel Talmor; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults.

Authors:  Roxanna Bloomfield; David W Noble; Alexis Sudlow
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-13

10.  Prognostic Factors to Predict ICU Mortality in Patients with Severe ARDS Who Received Early and Prolonged Prone Positioning Therapy.

Authors:  Po-Hsin Lee; Chen-Tsung Kuo; Chiann-Yi Hsu; Shih-Pin Lin; Pin-Kuei Fu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.